Inside Blogger’s Corner

We’re busy setting up our connections here on Blogger’s Corner and having the normal IS issues experienced by anyone who uses LANs. The convention is making their best efforts to get the problems straightened out, but in the meantime I’ve found a wireless portal that works for the moment. Right now I’m sharing a table with some pretty impressive bloggers — Kevin Aylward from Wizbang, Matt Margolis from Blogs For Bush, and Scott Sala from Slant Point.
I already caught up with Generalissimo Duane and we’re sitting directly across from the Salem booth. I’ve met Tony Snow from Fox, who immediately recognized my name — which floored me. I’ll report later on the breakfast with Matthew Dowd and the interesting speech and Q & A we had this morning.

The Calm Before The Storm

I had an opportunity to get out on the street early this morning when I went downstairs to get a much-needed cup of coffee to bolster my blogging. I took a few pictures that were necessarily a bit fuzzy, as the light was still pretty faint and the flash resulted in poor illumination of the scenery.
You can see the calm on the streets that likely will be absent during the day today, as more traffic and protests will jam the sidewalks around the convention site. The first picture is from the hotel looking down 33rd, and has the Empire State Building in the background. You can see that the street itself is completely barricaded:
Empire State Building
This picture is straight across from the Hotel Pennsylvania, where they’re allowing vehicle traffic for the moment. I expect this to be barricaded later on today:
day1msg.jpg
In order to get in and out of the protected area, I have to show my photo ID and my room key at all times. They are serious about securing this event, and believe me, it’s comforting.

Kerry’s Voting Record Reflects The Prevailing Wind More Than Conviction

Today’s National Journal daily (no web link) reports on its ratings becoming a talking point in this election cycle, due to the top rating that John Kerry received for his voting record last year. In an experience that NJ reporter Charles Green calls “disconcerting,” Journal editors have heard George Bush and Dick Cheney use the rating on the campaign trail, without giving the context of how the ratings are compiled, although the context hardly casts glory on the Massachussetts senator:

When the tabulations came in for 2003, John Kerry had the highest composite liberal score of any senator.
But there was an asterisk. As with other lawmakers who were running for president, Kerry missed a lot of votes in 2003 — 37 of the 62 that were being used in the vote ratings. He didn’t vote often enough to merit scores in the social policy and foreign affairs categories. (Under our system, a member has to participate in at least half the votes in the category to receive a score in that category.) He did cast enough votes (19 of 32) in the economic category to get a rating. On those votes, Kerry took the “liberal” position every time [emph mine – CE].

It’s interesting to me, although Green never mentions it, that even though Kerry missed a number of votes, he always returned to vote on those bills on which he voted the liberal position, especially on economics. It demonstrates that Kerry may show flexibility on legislation when as a matter of conducting business, but when he really feels the need to cast a vote on a bill, he only appears to be motivated by those on which he holds the most extreme views.
The Journal argues that one year is not enough to draw on, and they put together a chart of Kerry’s annual rating from the journal since 1985, his first year in the Senate. Kerry’s annual rating ranges from 96.5 (2003) to 76.7 (2000). In fact, when averaging their scores over the tenure of Kerry’s service, Kerry comes in 11th among active senators, behing such luminaries as Ted Kennedy, Paul Sarbanes, and our own Mark Dayton, who tops the list. (No surprise there.) However, the Journal missed an interesting trend in Kerry’s record, one that became apparent to me when they showed his individual scores. Here’s a chart showing Kerry’s liberal voting tendencies, by year, according to the National Journal:
1985…..91.8
1986…..93.5
1987…..81.7
1988…..93.0
1989…..79.5
1990…..92.7
1991…..85.8
1992…..80.7
1993…..83.2
1994…..80.4
1995…..78.2
1996…..84.5
1997…..85.2
1998…..86.8
1999…..82.8
2000…..76.7
2001…..87.7
2002…..87.3
2003…..96.5
Do you see the trend? Kerry voted more liberally when a Republican was in the White House than during the Clinton administration, an interesting insight into Kerry’s leadership qualities and the attempt to take the center during the last Democratic administration. Kerry’s ratings during the Reagan and both Bush administrations average out to 88.2, which would have placed Kerry seventh all time, just below Barbara Boxer. His ratings during the Clinton administration averaged 82.225, placing him 17th. Either rating, by the way, places him among the most liberal third of the Democratic contingent in the Senate.
Kerry seems to lack the courage of his convictions, preferring to tote the party line rather than remain consistent in practice. This, combined with a stunning lack of legislative accomplishment despite his seniority, really speaks against trusting him with the executive office he seeks.

Takin’ It To The Streets

The New York Times reports on what I missed with my late arrival yesterday, the day before the opening of the Republican National Convention, but the unnerving effects of having a half-million people in the street certainly accounts for the tension I felt on my arrival:

A roaring two-mile river of demonstrators surged through the canyons of Manhattan yesterday in the city’s largest political protest in decades, a raucous but peaceful spectacle that pilloried George W. Bush and demanded regime change in Washington.
On a sweltering August Sunday, the huge throng of protesters marched past Madison Square Garden, the site of the Republican National Convention opening today, and denounced President Bush as a misfit who had plunged America into war and runaway debt, undermined civil and constitutional rights, lied to the people, despoiled the environment and used the presidency to benefit corporations and millionaires.
The protest organizer, United for Peace and Justice, estimated the crowd at 500,000, rivaling a 1982 antinuclear rally in Central Park, and double the number it had predicted. It was, at best, a rough estimate. The Police Department, as is customary, offered no official estimate, but one officer in touch with the police command center at Madison Square Garden agreed that the crowd appeared to be close to a half-million.

Robert McFadden glosses it up just a bit when he calls it “peaceful”, as the police department had to contend with protestors throwing ball bearings and marbles onto the street where their mounted units deployed, and spot incidents of violence occurred along the two-mile protest. Later on, of course, the hard-core protestors that couldn’t be satisfied with merely marching had to come back for more:

After the march, hundreds of protesters in a more belligerent mood made their way to Times Square and blocked the entrances of two Midtown hotels, while another group harassed Republican guests at a party at the Boathouse restaurant in Central Park. … At a news conference last night, Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said there had been about 200 arrests, mostly for disorderly conduct, though nine people were charged with felony assaults on officers who were seizing a 10th suspect for setting a small fire outside the Garden, and 15 members of an anarchist group called Black Block were arrested after they knocked down police barriers and hurled bottles at police lines at 34th Street and Avenue of the Americas.

What we have here is the last gasp of the people who have been proven wrong by history over and over again — and I think they know it. United for Peace and Justice, as McFadden reports, organized nuclear-freeze protests all during Reagan’s terms in office, attempting to achieve peace through appeasement. (Hugh Hewitt noted last night that counterprotestors should carry pictures of Neville Chamberlain, but at least Chamberlain finally learned from events.) The anarchists likely participated in the Seattle-WTO protests last decade, and they still insist on protested free trade even though it helped advance the American and world economy for more than a decade now.
Now we have all of the foaming political Luddite masses in one place here in New York, and the nation can see what they represent — a retreat not just to September 10th, but a return to isolationism and protectionism that died with the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. Most of the protestors were born into a world defined by American power, as I was. Unfortunately, most of them have never studied the history of the world before that, where international power vacuums encouraged by the illusions of “internatoinal law” promoted by weak multilateral organizations led to chaos, war, genocide, and the deaths of tens of millions of people.
I’m sure I’ll see plenty more of the chaotic and barely peaceful protests while I’m here. I’ll bring you pictures of anything that comes up, but I can tell you that nearby the hotel and Madison Square Garden, the NYPD are on the job and not taking anything for granted. In fact, after further reflection, the two most welcoming people in my long odyssey last night were the young officers on the barricades who kept me from getting to the hotel but took the time to chat with me about the city they obviously love.

Several Unfunny Things Happened To Me On The Way To The Forum

NEW YORK CITY, 10:56 PM ET: I have finally eaten dinner on what had to have been one of the longest and most frustrating travel days in my life. The fact that I’m blogging is in itself a minor miracle.
Earlier today, while I was airport blogging about the vacuity of Dan Rather, I received a very kind and generous e-mail from two CQ readers (husband & wife) who wanted to make a large donation for the trip but had been stymied by the Amazon system. They wanted to pay for part of my hotel room instead, so I told them where I was staying. Fortunately I was on line when I got a reply. They had called the hotel and found out that they’d canceled my reservation — and the airport had just announced preboarding for my flight.
I got on my cell phone and called the Hotel Pennsylvania’s reservation desk to find out what the hell happened. They informed me that since I had not shown up for Saturday night, my reservation had been cancelled. I informed them that I had called Saturday morning and confirmed my reservation, starting Sunday night August 29th through Friday morning. After a long and tense conversation, the manager finally stepped in and reinstated my reservation just as I boarded the plane.
The flight was mostly uneventful, and we landed at JFK in Queens at about 6:15 ET. I had dinner plans with several other bloggers at a Brazilian restaurant in Manhattan for 8, and I knew I’d be pushing it no matter what. I made my only mistake at this point and called a SuperShuttle rather than a cab or a limo, which would have taken me right to the hotel. Instead, I got bundled in with several other travelers coming into Manhattan, including a nice Minnesota college graduate who is moving to the East Village to work in the apparel business. It took until 8:30 for the driver to drop me off, and thanks to the street closings around Madison Square Garden and the Hotel Pennsylvania, he dropped me off two blocks from the hotel.
Tonight is warm and just a bit muggy but not bad walking weather, so I cheerfully set out to walk the last bit. Several police officers cheerfully stopped me and asked for my ID and proof of my hotel reservation, and since I didn’t print out my e-mail (who knew?), they would not let me pass. I called the hotel on my cell phone and asked them to send someone down to rescue me. The two young NYPD officers were complete gentlemen, keeping me company with small talk and pointing out some of the landmarks from 33rd and 6th. After a half-hour, I started to think that help was not on its way, and called the hotel again. They told me that the PD wouldn’t let them come down that way to get me, but the other end of the hotel was open to street traffic and that I could walk down to 34th and come in on 7th.
So off I trudged.
After finally arriving at the hotel, I made a beeline for the desk, thinking I could still make it for drinks if I hurried. When I try to check in, of course, no one could find my reservation. The manager had to come out and get it straight, which took no griping from me, and I went up to my room, exhausted. The first thing I wanted to do was to access my e-mail so I could find out where the group was planning to go for drinks … and that’s when I’d discovered that my room had no Internet access.
Bear in mind that the entire point of my being here is to blog the convention, and you’ll get an idea of the desperation I felt at this point.
I call the desk, who connects me to someone else, and the conversation goes like this:
Me: I don’t have an RJ-45 connector in my room.
Helpful and Concerned Hotel Employee: Uh-huh.
Me: How do I get Internet access?
HCHE: You can use dial-up.
Me: No I can’t, I don’t have a dial-up account. I’m staying here because you have high-speed Internet access.
HCHE: We only have DSL on two floors, sir.
Me: Then move me to another floor.
HCHE: We don’t have any more rooms available, sir. You can use the WebTV system in your room if you want to access the Internet.
Me: I need to use my laptop.
HCHE: The WebTV is the only high-speed Internet access you can get from your room.
Me: How much is that to use? [The high-speed access is $10/day.]
HCHE: Five dollars.
Me: A day?
HCHE: For thirty minutes.
Me: Let me speak to your manager.
After repeating much the same conversation with the manager, I finally blew up and said, “The Republican National Committee invited me here to report on the convention, which requires me to have Internet access. I suspect that they reserved me a room with it, which I probably had until you guys cancelled my reservation on me.”
They moved me to another room, and a nicer one at that, and so I’m blogging now. However, I will be hitting the sack in a few minutes so I can get up early for the bloggers’ breakfast tomorrow — otherwise I won’t get my credential, and I’ll spend my week being the chew toy for Gunther The Killer Canine Officer instead of bringing you the best of the RNC.
I should have a better day tomorrow, because Lord knows, it’ll be hard to top this one.

Happy First Blogiversary To QandO

Before it was a triumvirate, the essential neolibertarian blog QandO started out as a Blogspot site with just a single blogger, Jon Henke. Today he celebrates his first blogiversary, having started just about five weeks before I did. Jon, and his partners Dale Franks and McQ, have spent that year building QandO into a tremendous voice for political and economic thought. It’s on my list of daily must-reads (especially after they made it Mozilla-friendly). If you aren’t reading QandO regularly, clear some time to do so. You won’t be sorry.
Happy blogiversary to three esteemed colleagues, one of whom has been a tremendous blog-friend and a source of support and inspiration for me. The best is yet to come, Jon!

Captain’s Caption Contest #25: Watch Your Back Edition

It’s Friday, so it must be time for another edition of the Captain’s Caption Contest! We’re about to come into the home stretch of the presidential campaign, where tempers get short and stress begins to show. And that’s just among the talking heads at CNBC! Just imagine what it’s like for the actual candidates. In fact, you don’t need to imagine at all:
Tony Hopkins For President!
Guest judging the contest this week will be Bear, a CQ reader and commenter who sent me a slew of pics this week and all of them could have worked. As always, put your best caption entries in the comments section — NO e-mail, please! (E-mailed entries will be typed as journal entries at Sa Dec and run across the Cambodian border in a magic hat.) The contest will remain open until noon Sunday [my travel day to New York!], August 29th, at which point the comments will be closed and Bear will pick the winners.
In the meantime, if you enjoy the contests and the blog, consider dropping in a donation for Captain’s Quarters trip to New York as a credentialed blogger at the Republican National Convention. (And huge thanks to all who have already contributed!) Just click on one of the buttons below and donate whatever you can to the cause — all donations are cheerfully and gratefully accepted!









Amazon Honor System

Click Here to Pay Learn More


Let the games begin!
BUMP 8/28: I think we’ve already broken a record for entries, and we’re only halfway through the contest period! Bear, hope you don’t mind being buried in work Sunday afternoon …
COMMENTS CLOSED: About 25 minutes early, but I have to shut down for the trip to New York. Big record this week for the Caption Contest — 220 entries! Best of luck to Bear in picking the winners …

Power Line Fights Back

Last week, Scott Johnson and John Hinderaker of Power Line wrote an op-ed piece in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune detailing their frustration with the local and national coverage given to the deconstruction of John Kerry’s Viet Nam narrative. They specifically focused on the Christmas In Cambodia fable, which even the Kerry campaign now has retracted, and factually refuted it point by point.
The Strib’s editorial board responded in an editorial written by Jim Boyd that called Scott and John “fraudulent” and spewed a lot of vitriol abut the two being part of the “Republican smear machine” — but actually conceded their central point, calling it a “niggling criticism”. If so, then they must be the first fraudulent smear machine that operated by spreading the truth. Scott and John respond in today’s Strib after reaching an unusual agreement with the editorial board to be allowed to respond to Boyd’s vicious personal attack on the Strib’s editorial pages:

First, the basics. We wrote that the Kerry campaign has retracted Kerry’s oft-told tale of being in Cambodia on Christmas 1968. Boyd did not dispute this. We wrote that there is no record of John Kerry being in Cambodia in December 1968, or at any other time. Boyd did not dispute this. We wrote that Kerry’s commanding officers have denied that he was ever sent into Cambodia. Boyd did not dispute this. We wrote that not a single crewman who ever served with Kerry has supported Kerry’s claim to have been in Cambodia, and several crewmen have denied that their boat was ever in Cambodia. Boyd did not dispute this. We wrote that there is no record of Swift boats being used for clandestine missions as claimed by Kerry. Boyd did not dispute this. We wrote that Swift boats were unsuited for such secret missions, given their large size and noise. Boyd did not dispute this.
Gosh, for fraudulent smear artists, we seem to be doing pretty well. Given that he didn’t deny any of our main points, what did Boyd have to say? Most importantly, he alleged that Kerry was in Cambodia, but it was in January 1969, not December 1968. Thus, Boyd wrote, ours is an “accurate but niggling criticism.” Of course, there is no more evidence for Kerry being in Cambodia in January 1969 than in December 1968.
But when Kerry told his famous story to the Senate in 1986 — the story that he says was “seared — seared” into his memory, he was very specific about the timing of his life-altering experience. It was Christmas 1968, and he heard President Richard Nixon denying that we had troops in Cambodia while he himself had been sent there. It was this experience, he said, that caused him to lose his faith in the American government.
We pointed out that Kerry’s account was obviously false, since Nixon was not president in December 1968. Boyd responded that Nixon was then president-elect, so Kerry’s “discrepancy” was “understandable.” Obviously, however, a president-elect was in no position to assure the American people that there were no troops in Cambodia.

It’s well worth noting that Power Line challenged Jim Boyd to debate them in an open forum at our first State Fair appearance, in front of a live audience, in order to put the entire issue to rest and hopefully to part respectfully, if not in friendship. Scott and John issued a number of requests to Boyd to do this, both by e-mail and on their blog. Boyd did not deign to respond to their requests, and the seat we reserved for him at the booth sat empty the entire three hours.
Some people, it seems, lack the courage to back up their venomous words with action. It’s the mark of a bully that they slink away when discovering they’re outmatched.

The Vicious Circle Of The 21st Century

Normally on the day before I travel, I do my best to get to bed early, sometimes start to pack the night before, and get plenty of rest for the upcoming day. However, last night I had an opportunity to spend an evening with a group of tremendously intelligent and opinionated gentlemen at James Lileks’ Jasperwood estate, with Hugh Hewitt as the honored guest. A dozen bloggers had a smoker and debated politics, blogs, pop culture, and just about every topic imaginable (including the ethics of trivia contests) under the cool skies of south Minneapolis with as much passion and humor as any round-table I’ve ever experienced.
In fact, it’s easy to feel outclassed when you’re surrounded by this all-star lineup of bloggers and pundits: Hugh, James, Generalissimo Duane, Scott “Big Trunk” Johnson, Mitch Berg, King Banaian, The Elder and Saint Paul from Fraters Libertas, The One Big Swede, The Crazy Uke, Chumley Wonderbar, David Strom, and Long Suffering Jay Larson. Instead of putting in an appearance for an hour or so and begging off, as was my original plan, we all stayed past midnight, scaring the neighbors of Jasperwood with our conservative debate and the heaping of scorn on the likes of Jm Boyd, John Kerry, Chris Matthews, and so on.
It seems to me that just as the nascent print media in the 20’s produced the Algonquin Round Table, made famous primarily by the writings of Dorothy Parker, so has the new media of the new century produced loose associations such as the Northern Alliance and evenings like last night. This evening covered much more than just the mechanics of blogging and intramural gossip; we debated national and international issues, always with a sense of humor, but using arguments that I’m sure will find their way into our blogs over the next few weeks.
And what struck me was the egalitarian nature of the entire discussion. The group split into two or three ever-changing discussions, with people migrating from one to the other with an ease that struck me as very telling about either the breadth of knowledge each member had or their ability to fake it, either one of which (or both) was impressive. Once in a while I thought to myself that the conversation was surely scaling down, and someone would toss in a completely unrelated question, and the energy would flood back into the debate as everyone weighed it with responses and supporting arguments.
It was one hell of a good time, and when I finally dragged myself out of Jasperwood, drunk on the chance of spending an evening with intellectual heavyweights but otherwise stone-cold sober, I could not believe that four hours had passed. Unfortunately, it ate up the rest of my blogging time last night and this morning — and I have to get ready for my early-afternoon flight. I will try to post a few pictures from our live show at the Minnesota State Fair yesterday, and then I’ll be back late tonight to catch up on the news.
Thanks, James and Hugh, for a wonderful evening.

This Makes Me Feel Better About My Trip

The AP reports that two men have been arrested in New York City on the eve of the Republican National Convention, for plotting explosive attacks on the subway system:

A U.S. citizen and a Pakistani national were arrested in an alleged plot to bomb a subway station in midtown Manhattan and possibly other locations around the city, police said Saturday.
Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said the men were not thought to be connected to al-Qaida or any other international terrorist organization, although he said they expressed hatred for America. The arrests come two days before the start of the Republican National Convention, which is drawing tens of thousands of visitors into the city.
Though there was no clear tie to the convention, authorities moved to arrest the two men before it began, two law-enforcement sources told The Associated Press.

The police report that the men were apprehended before getting their hands on any actual explosives, which means that they had been tracked for some time before their arrest. They scouted out locations around the city, including the subway station nearest to Madison Square Garden, which is where the convention is being held. Not too surprisingly, the pair expressed hatred towards the United States, and also anti-Semitic statements as well. Color me shocked.
Expect to hear more about roundups in the next 24-48 hours such as this. The NYPD and FBI will pull the chains on all surveillance operations that they can ahead of the actual festivities this week, and the arrests may bring more actionable intelligence for later operations.
I may still look askance at the subway station, however …