A Guide To Able Danger Posts At CQ

In order for CQ readers to access the new posts covering the emerging scandal surrounding the revelations about the Able Danger data-mining project that accurately identified Mohammed Atta and three other 9/11 hijackers, I have created a new category for these posts called 9/11 Commission. Here are the posts so far that have gone into this category:

9/11 Cell Identified In 2000

Dafydd: Tangled Webs, Contrasting Countdowns
Confirmation Of Able Danger Raises Even More Questions
9/11 Commission Acknowledges Briefing On Able Danger
The Second Half Of 9/11
9/11 Commission Changes Its Story — Again
Rethinking Prague After Able Danger
The Wall, The White Memo, And The DoD
NEW: Another Detail The 9/11 Commission Seems To Have Missed
Later on, I will try to update older posts relating to the 9/11 Commission to put them in this same category. This will be a subcategory of the War on Terror category, so all of these posts will remain within that group as well. Hopefully this post will provide a quick guide to the coverage of Able Danger here at CQ in the meantime.
UPDATE: WorldNet Daily notes some of my analysis in their overview on Able Danger and the collapse of the 9/11 Commission’s credibility. Darn, no hyperlinks, but a very nice summary of a few of the above posts.

12 thoughts on “A Guide To Able Danger Posts At CQ”

  1. Able Danger Scandal

    This one seems to be gathering quite a head of steam. It is being reported that the Able Danger data mining project identified the 9/11 cell sometime in 1999, and the 9/11 comission knew about it and still omitted it from their reports. From NRO’s T…

  2. The farcical legacy of the 9-11 Commission

    So now we know that (1) the 9-11 Commission covered up the fact that military intelligence had tagged Atta and friends as al-Qaeda terrorists operating in the US in 2000, but the military intel agents could not inform the FBI thanks to the WALL; and (2…

  3. Able Danger; Disabled Commission

    Any credibility the 9/11 Commission had has been completely destroyed:
    The Sept. 11 commission knew military intelligence officials had identified lead hijacker Mohamed Atta as a member of al-Qaida who might be part of U.S.-based terror cell more th…

  4. If You Only Watch the Nightly News

    …or scan the headlines in your daily newspaper, the links below may be a series of rude eye-openers. A Guide To Able Danger Posts At Captain's Quarters (one of many) Protect Us, But Don't Look at Us @ Thumos Able Danger and Jamie Gor…

  5. Another piece of the puzzle

    …a bunch of pissed-off law enforcement people, knowing that a big problem was brewing, went behind the backs of their superiors to share info that Reno’s Justice Department didn’t want shared? The timing is particularly important I think.

  6. Commission Admission

    The Able Danger team identified five al Qaeda cells around the world in 2000; in the United States, Kenya, Tanzania, Yemen and Germany. As we know now, the German cell moved to the US and, of course, those members perpetrated

  7. 9/11 Cover Up?

    When the 9/11 Commission convened last year, I had the sense that the Democrats on board – particularly Richard Ben-Veniste and Jaime Gorelick – had the dual mission of protecting the Clinton administration and damning Bush’s for errors that led to the…

  8. Blogstorm Warning

    You need to read the following – updated as of last night, not as of this morning, so there may be more that should be added to the list (and no doubt are) – about the rapidly developing story of the 9/11 Commission’s failure (refusal?) to deal with th…

  9. What Did Clinton Know and When Did He Know It?

    It didn’t take long after the horror of 9/11 for Liberals and Democrats (are the words interchangeable?) to start asking “What did Bush know and when did he know it?”, as if W were privy to the plans of Al Qaeda that terrible day.

Comments are closed.