My Rebuttal To Eason Jordan

Dear Mr. Jordan,
While I appreciate your response, I find it singularly inadequate. Just in terms of the one incident in Davos, your characterization of the debate fails to match with the two independent sources we have already seen. The first source, Forumblog, tells us that your forum was videotaped. Where is the transcript? Why don’t you simply produce that, or a videotape on CNN, with the portion of your statement? Surely CNN has the resources to track the tape down. The fact that your own news service fails to make that information available causes me to discount your characterization.
Unfortunately, even had I been inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt about Davos, you have a clear pattern of speaking abroad to audiences inclined towards anti-Western sentiment and making unsubstantiated charges against the US and Israel. You also need to explain your statements in the following venues:
November 2004 – You asserted that US military forces illegally detained 10 or more journalists and subjected them to torture. You said that you based this allegation on reports you’d seen which you believe to be true. Why didn’t CNN publish these reports? Where are they now? Which journalists were tortured, and by whom? It’s been almost four months since you made these charges, Mr. Jordan, and we have seen nothing from CNN.
October 2002 – You claimed that Israeli forces had a policy of targeting journalists, alleging that they had deliberately shot a CNN reporter as a result:

We’re not trying to favour one side over the other we’re not going to pull any punches in our reporting but the truth hurts sometimes and it hurts both sides but it’s a mistake to target the news media. We’ve had enormous frustrations in having access to occupied areas of the West Bank and Israeli forces on a number of occasions have shot at CNN personnel and in fact did shoot one CNN correspondent, he was badly wounded. The Israelis say they’re actually trying to restrict our access to these areas and they say it’s too dangerous for you to be there and my response to that is that it wouldn’t be nearly as dangerous if you didn’t shoot at us when we’re clearly labelled as CNN crews and journalists. And so this must stop, this targeting of the news media both literally and figuratively must come to an end immediately.

The only CNN journalist wounded in that region was Ben Wedeman, who got shot when he wandered into a crossfire. Your own producer, Bruce Conover, told CNN that no one could tell who shot him, as the bullets and mortars were flying in from all directions. Again, you provided no specifics, no names, and no substantiation whatsoever for the notion that the IDF deliberately targets journalists. Again, you made these statements in a foreign country where your remarks were likely to get less scrutiny in the US and approbation from the people who dislike America and Americans. And I note, once again, that CNN never reported on any special program to target journalists in combat zones, despite your allegations. We can only conclude from this that your rhetoric was immature, irresponsible, and completely unsubstantiated — again.
Until you can account for the Davos transcript so that we can all see the context of your remarks and explain your prevarications in the above two egregious examples of slander, then you have no credibility and neither does the news organization which takes its orders from you. Your position as the head of a major news organization and as a journalist requires you to be responsible for your words and actions. You have proven yourself to be inadequate to that task and disrespectful of the truth, and as such, you should resign immediately. As long as you remain in charge of CNN, nothing they report will have any credibility.
UPDATE: Welcome, Instapundit readers!

11 thoughts on “My Rebuttal To Eason Jordan”

  1. CNN in a Flat Spin

    ” ‘Flat spin: Is it the end?’ No. Usually it is the crash that follows the flat spin that ruins your whole day.”Captain Ed is all over the Eason Jordan story Go read all of the posts and you’ll see…

  2. Not Just Eason Jordan? Chris Cramer Too?

    LGF links to a post from November 2004 which quotes yet another CNN executive, Chris Cramer, as follows:
    “Most were deliberately targeted for seeking out the truth. And in more than 94% of those cases, no one has been brought to trial,&#8221…

  3. Eason Jordan Keeps Digging

    As has been noted all over the blogosphere, Captain Ed has dominated the Eason Jordan story. Last night, Jordan once again made an attempt at damage control rather than do the right thing. His lame explanation? When he says

  4. Jordan needs to plead the fifth.

    It’s time for Eason Jordan to plead The Fifth and shut up. Because everything the man says is prevarication. For a man who claims a higher allegiance, to Journalistic Truth, to so obviously lie is becoming painful. It’s like watching a Baptist tie a…


    There’s a new site on the ’sphere…the Easongate blog. The mission: … And of course, they have MUST-READ links to others covering the story. I’ve been reading a lot about this slimy bastard, but I’ve shamefully not writ…

  6. Dispatch From The Front Lines

    If you’re reading this then I’m probably dead, and the dastardly right-wing minions of that bumbling idiot in the White House, the Chimperor-in-Chief have won… This is my Last Will and Testament. I write to tell you of a conspiracy…

  7. Eason Jordon: A Nation Remembers

    As the sun struggled to break through the early morning fog gripping the surrounding hills, a still-sleepy nation wrestled with disbelief and shock. One of America’s heroes, Eason Jordan, was gone and for many of them the political landscape would…

  8. Easongate Roundup

    I have not jumped on this story because there are so many covering it so well. But here is a rundown and a roundup of links. “Here are the basics. At the World Economic Forum Eason Jordan, a CNN executive, made the accusation that US soldiers were …

Comments are closed.