Pence Amendment On Fairness Doctrine: Live Blog

I have heard from Rep. Mike Pence’s office that debate on his amendment to bar the FCC from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine will begin shortly, perhaps around 1:30 ET. It should last 40 minutes, and I’ll live-blog it. This is an important amendment, and I suspect it will not survive — but we need to keep the heat on Congress to keep them from making the federal government the arbiter of the content of political speech.
Keep checking back!
Democrats say they will accept the amendment. Read below.
12:56 CT – Well, the House has debated a number of issues so far, but none of them Pence’s amendment. I’ll have to start show prep soon, but I’m hoping that the debate will start shortly. We’ll see …
1:00 – Pence is coming to the podium on his amendment now. 40 minutes of debate …
1:02 – Pence notes that the Fairness Doctrine had a chilling effect on public debate. Broadcasters simply wouldn’t risk their licenses in order to air public debate, because of the onerous burdens it placed on second-to-second management of content.
1:04 – Pence says that people claim that his amendment is unnecessary, but that within the last 48 hours, three senior Democrats have talked about reinstating the FD: Durbin, Kerry, Feinstein. Good, short speech.
1:07 – David Obey completely ignores the statements from three Democratic Senators and says no one in Congress has talked about resurrecting the FD. He then confuses broadcast media with the rest of the mainstream media. However, this seems a moot point, since the Democrats apparently will concede the amendment; even Obey shrugged it off.
1:10 – Jeff Flake rebukes Obey, in a friendly manner, by reading Durbin’s quote.
1:10 – Dennis Kucinich now says that it’s a non-issue — even though he himself called for a return of the FD! He then talks about how the FCC “controls the airwaves”.
1:14 – Kucinich darkly referred to future administrations resurrecting the FD — and Pence sys that’s precisely the point of the amendment. Diane Watson mischaracterizes everyone’s argument, and then says only six corporations have control over public debate. Huh? We have the most open public debate in American history — and part of that came from the removal of the federal government as arbiter of the content of broadcasts.
1:19 – Roy Blunt says market forces should prevail in public debate, rather than top-down government management of political content.
1:21 – Shorter Jose Serrano (D-NY): Trust us, the government will just put moderates on the air! He wants to know why the GOP wants to fix what’s not broken, and the obvious answer is that we don’t want the FCC and the Democrats to break it.
1:26 – Greg Walden: “It’s not my fault that Air America couldn’t find an audience!” He also reminded Congress that the courts have warned in the past that the FD was likely unconstitutional.
1:33 – A number of Republicans have made the point that the FD came from an era when the US had few broadcast stations, and few options for informing the public. Even if one accepted that the FD didn’t violate free speech, today’s society hardly requires the government to force broadcasters to carry speech for balance.
1:40 – It looks like the Democrats mostly gave up arguing about the amendment. It looks like they have yielded most of their time to the Republicans.
1:42 – I spoke too soon. David Obey quotes Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address to scold “yap-yap TV” and talk radio for not demanding a Fairness Doctrine — so we can get a balanced media. Is Obey ill? Does he not understand that the FD didn’t apply to newspapers?
1:46 – Obey says, “I want to let Rush be Rush!” He says Rush is discredited and he wants to keep it that way. I think he’s making this up as he’s going along.
1:50 – The ayes had it, but the roll-call vote will be postponed. It looks like Pence wins.

12 thoughts on “Pence Amendment On Fairness Doctrine: Live Blog”

  1. Tell Mike I said, hello. I haven’t seen him in years, but he’ll remember me from the Indiana University days with his brother Ed. Sigma Nu Fraternity and all of that…

  2. 6 corporations control the airwaves? Pish-posh, everyone knows they are all controlled by Sith Lord Rove.
    If the FD passes, does that mean NPR will have a counterpoint to Dan Schorr every Saturday morning?

  3. I am glad it will make it thru but saying they can not put the FD back in operation does not mean they can not put the new Equal Time Doctrine in its place.
    I would not be to surprised if the new and improved ET had something about the intertubes in it.

  4. If the FD passes, does that mean NPR will have a counterpoint to Dan Schorr every Saturday morning?

    I suppose it would depend on whether Bill Moyers has any time free.

  5. In every one of the dozens of letters I sent to Senators about the Immigration Bill, at the end I mentioned that if they thought this was creating an angry reaction in the citizenry, they haven’t seen anything- just wait to see what happens if a return to the Fairness Doctrine is proposed!
    Re:NPR / Dan Schorr – it is my understanding that the FD proposals effect only AM radio… the only medium where conservative thought is dominant – a total coincidence I am sure.

  6. If the fairness doctrine is reinstituted it will almost certainly be headed for the supreme court. It would be interesting to see how it did there. I could easily see the court rejecting it.

  7. Thanks for live-blogging Cap. Whenever I hear Congress in action, it reminds me why I distrust so many of them. As you note, some of them are unaware of what FD covers (broadcast, not print) and despite their ignorance, they spout on to confirm that they are undeducated.
    As Sherlock pointed out in regard to Immigration, these clowns are remarkably out of touch with the pulse of the voters. So much power, so little knowledge. It is not as if this is particle physics.

  8. “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech”
    “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech”
    “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech”
    Wouldn’t it be nice if one of the Congressdildoes just chanted that for 5 minutes? Why are these guys even debating — as if the laws they’ve made COULD be used to abridge freedom of speech?
    (Yes, I know, I’m being idealistic).

  9. Important, you bet! Thank you for blogging it.
    Pity me: Watson is my so-called representative…

  10. A victory for free speech

    Alexander Bolton at The Hill reports that true lovers and defenders of free speech have something to smile about after yesterday:
    The House voted overwhelmingly Thursday to prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from using taxpayer dollar…

Comments are closed.