So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit

Over the past year or so, I have provided CQ readers with a number of translations from key Iraqi Intelligence Service documents that have been translated by either the FMSO or by Joseph Shahda of the Free Republic website. I even engaged two interpreters to verify one particularly explosive memo last April, after Shahda published his own translation. That memo dealt with IIS plans to get volunteers for suicide missions to ‘strike American interests”.
One particular criticism that appeared with each new translation was that the documents were never proven genuine, although no one could explain the logic behind the US government hiding these documents in Iraqi Arabic among an avalanche of mundanity, only to shove it onto a shelf for years until Congress authorized their release to the Internet. Now we find another verification of their authenticity, this time from the New York Times, which reports today that the documents constitute a national-security threat:

Last March, the federal government set up a Web site to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war. The Bush administration did so under pressure from Congressional Republicans who said they hoped to “leverage the Internet” to find new evidence of the prewar dangers posed by Saddam Hussein.
But in recent weeks, the site has posted some documents that weapons experts say are a danger themselves: detailed accounts of Iraq’s secret nuclear research before the 1991 Persian Gulf war. The documents, the experts say, constitute a basic guide to building an atom bomb.
Last night, the government shut down the Web site after The New York Times asked about complaints from weapons experts and arms-control officials. A spokesman for the director of national intelligence said access to the site had been suspended “pending a review to ensure its content is appropriate for public viewing.”
Officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency, fearing that the information could help states like Iran develop nuclear arms, had privately protested last week to the American ambassador to the agency, according to European diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the issue’s sensitivity. One diplomat said the agency’s technical experts “were shocked” at the public disclosures.
The documents, roughly a dozen in number, contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that nuclear experts who have viewed them say go beyond what is available on the Internet and in other public forums. For instance, the papers give detailed information on how to build nuclear firing circuits and triggering explosives, as well as the radioactive cores of atom bombs.

This is apparently the Times’ November surprise, but it’s a surprising one indeed. The Times has just authenticated the entire collection of memos, some of which give very detailed accounts of Iraqi ties to terrorist organizations. Just this past Monday, I posted a memo which showed that the Saddam regime actively coordinated with Palestinian terrorists in the PFLP as well as Hamas and Islamic Jihad. On September 20th, I reposted a translation of an IIS memo written four days after 9/11 that worried the US would discover Iraq’s ties to Osama bin Laden.
It doesn’t end there with the Times, either. In a revelation buried far beneath the jump, the Times acknowledges that the UN also believed Saddam to be nearing development of nuclear weapons:

Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990’s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf war. Experts say that at the time, Mr. Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.
European diplomats said this week that some of those nuclear documents on the Web site were identical to the ones presented to the United Nations Security Council in late 2002, as America got ready to invade Iraq. But unlike those on the Web site, the papers given to the Security Council had been extensively edited, to remove sensitive information on unconventional arms.

That appears to indicate that by invading in 2003, we followed the best intelligence of the UN inspectors to head off the development of an Iraqi nuke. This intelligence put Saddam far ahead of Iran in the nuclear pursuit, and made it much more urgent to take some definitive action against Saddam before he could build and deploy it. And bear in mind that this intelligence came from the UN, and not from the United States. The inspectors themselves developed it, and they meant to keep it secret. The FMSO site blew their cover, and they’re very unhappy about it.
What other highlights has the Times now authenticated? We have plenty:
* 2001 IIS memo directing its agents to test mass grave sites in southern Iraq for radiation, and to use “trusted news agencies” to leak rumors about the lack of credibility of Coalition reporting on the subject. They specify CNN.
* The Blessed July operation, in which Saddam’s sons planned a series of assassinations in London, Iran, and southern Iraq
* Saddam’s early contacts with Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda from 1994-7
* UNMOVIC knew of a renewed effort to make ricin from castor beans in 2002, but never reported it
* The continued development of delivery mechanisms for biological and chemical weapons by the notorious “Dr. Germ” in 2002
Actually, we have much, much more. All of these documents underscore the threat posed by Saddam Hussein and show that his regime continued their work on banned weapons programs. We have made this case over and over again, but some people refused to believe the documents were genuine. Now we have no less of an authority than the New York Times to verify that the IIS documentation is not only genuine, but presents a powerful argument for the military action to remove Saddam from power.
The Times wanted readers to cluck their tongues at the Bush administration for releasing the documents, although Congress actually did that. However, the net result should be a complete re-evaluation of the threat Saddam posed by critics of the war. Let’s see if the Times figures this out for themselves.
UPDATE: More at Stop the ACLU and QandO. And Michelle Malkin has a great take on this — the paper that blew a series of highly classified national-security programs wants to point fingers about the status of these documents?
UPDATE II: Bump to top. And The Anchoress has dreamed up a hilarious dialogue at the NYT — don’t miss it.
UPDATE III: Yes, I understand the difference between 1991 and 2002. What the critics of this post seem to miss is this:
1. Saddam still had all of the relevant documentation to restart his nuclear program, so the UNSCOM and UNMOVIC teams obviously did not “destroy all vestiges” of Iraq’s nuclear program. After all, the documentation is what the Times proclaimed as a dangerous breach that would allow Iran to build a bomb.
2. If the FMSO documents on the website are dangerous to publish because they might assist Iran in designing a nuclear weapon, then obviously they were dangerous sitting in Saddam’s files. Missing that particular point seems willfully dense at best.
3. Saddam had unexpurgated copies of the IAEA report in his files — the ones that the UN inspectors are so unhappy about being hosted at the FMSO site. I wonder how that happened?
4. Since the rest of the FMSO documents came from the same locations as the ones that the NYT proclaims as authentic and dangerous, that means that the rest of these documents are authentic as well. That’s the primary point of this post — because when one looks through the documents, it becomes clear that Saddam had many connections to terrorism, and had active WMD programs right through 2002.

79 thoughts on “So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit”

  1. So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit

    Over the past year or so, I have provided CQ readers with a number of translations from key Iraqi Intelligence Service documents that have been translated by either the FMSO or by Joseph Shahda of the Free Republic website. I…

  2. Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought

    The New Yorks times confirms that in 2002 Saddam Hussein’s “scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away:”
    Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990’s and in…

  3. SURPRISE!!!: New York Times Planning Election Eve Iraq WMD Story

    According to Drudge, The New York Times is planning to print an exclusive story on Iraq and “research of nuke bomb” tomorrow that will “ignite news cycles.” Ace fantasizes: For those who want to hope… well, there is that talk…

  4. “U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer”

    I don’t normally post on the daily news type stuff but this article in the NY Times this morning is very interesting.  Instapundit posts on it and has links to a few other comments as well. The article concerns a bunch of Iraqi documents (48,…

  5. The Times Has Done It Again

    This time, though, I think they’re going to be pretty unhappy about what they’ve done. Attempting to go on offense and administer the coup de grace to their beleaguered opponent, the NY Times exposes a story today how Iraqi nuclear

  6. Boom

    Explosive November News So the United States government divulged a bunch of Iraqi documents under pressure from Republicans in Congress and conservative groups who feel the intelligence community is overwhelmed. When in doubt about who to blame for th…

  7. The Times Has Done It Again

    This time, though, I think they’re going to be pretty unhappy about what they’ve done. Attempting to go on offense and administer the coup de grace to their beleaguered opponent, the NY Times exposes a story today how Iraqi nuclear

  8. The Times Has Done It Again

    This time, though, I think they’re going to be pretty unhappy about what they’ve done. Attempting to go on offense and administer the coup de grace to their beleaguered opponent, the NY Times exposes a story today how Iraqi nuclear

  9. That Impartial Press….

    The extremely predictable last-minute election-swaying hit piece from the New York Times is just about due. Wonder what it will be this time…and if it will involve more national security leakage?

  10. That Impartial Press….

    The extremely predictable last-minute election-swaying hit piece from the New York Times is just about due. Wonder what it will be this time…and if it will involve more national security leakage?

  11. NYT – Iraq Had WMD!

    I have to admit I had a good deal of sympathy for the Instapundit’s “pre-mortem” where he said that if the republicans lose they did it by shooting themselves in the foot. Fortunately for them though, when it comes to self inflicted wounds, the democ…

  12. It Was Iran All Along

    Running Updates . . . Tracking the latest on Drudge: Federal government set up Web site — Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal — to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war; detailed accounts of Iraq’s

  13. NYT Splash On Friday Before Election – Updated

    The most snarky quotes in the NYT article are from Thomas S. Blanton…His group, The National Secruity Archive, hosted its 20th anniversary party in December 2005 headlined by Bill Moyers and Seymour Hersh. Yes, that Seymour Hersh, who yesterday was …

  14. BREAKING NEWS: Iranian Scientists NOT as Stoo-pid as U.S. Troops

    Clinton officials ‘shocked’ by failure of ‘nuanced plan’!!! Mullah Merlin heads to super secret bunker where he’s building a secret nuclear device that he got super secret plans from Clinton administration secret sources who secretly botched the super …

  15. New York Times Reveals Saddam Hussein’s Iraq Had Nuclear Weapons Plans

    Wow. A last-minute pre-election bombshell at the New York Times. And it has already gone nuclear. Jim Geraghty writes:I’m sorry, did the New York Times just put on the front page that IRAQ HAD A NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM AND WAS PLOTTING TO BUILD AN ATOM…

  16. True To Type

    The internet tubes are overloaded with commentary about The New York Times story reporting that a Pentagon website providing captured Iraqi documents was shut down when some experts noticed it included nuclear bomb-making plans. A short story by the Post

  17. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  18. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  19. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  20. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  21. BREAKING NEWS: Iranian Scientists NOT as Stoo-pid as U.S. Troops

    Clinton officials ‘shocked’ by failure of ‘nuanced plan’!!! Mullah Merlin heads to super secret bunker where he’s building a secret nuclear device that he got super secret plans from Clinton administration secret sources who secretly botched the super …

  22. Mid-Term (Open) Must-Read List /2

    Dick Morris, Jay Bryant, Michael Barone, Byron York, Rush Limbaugh, Neal Boortz, Ronald R. Griffin, Mark Mellman, Charlie Cook, Jonah Goldberg, Stuart Rothenberg, Mike Allen, Hugh Hewitt, Larry J. Sabato, David Wasserman, Peggy Noonan, Lawrence Kudlo…

  23. NYT Splash On Friday Before Election

    How convenient is that? Apparently the NYT is about to splash on its front page a breaking story, one, no doubt they hope will affect the election in the democrats’ favor. Drudge reports, NYT REPORTING FRIDAY, SOURCES SAY: Federal government

  24. …ABOUT THOSE WMD

    For about a year now, there has been an official website with translated and released documents from Iraq. These documents were among the millions of pages recovered from Baghdad at the end of the war, when the Iraqi army was defeated. It is a characte…

  25. …ABOUT THOSE WMD

    For about a year now, there has been an official website with translated and released documents from Iraq. These documents were among the millions of pages recovered from Baghdad at the end of the war, when the Iraqi army was defeated. It is a characte…

  26. …ABOUT THOSE WMD

    For about a year now, there has been an official website with translated and released documents from Iraq. These documents were among the millions of pages recovered from Baghdad at the end of the war, when the Iraqi army was defeated. It is a characte…

  27. Ah, So Saddam Was Making a Nuclear Bomb. Thanks For Confirming, NY Times

    Did you know that Iraq actually had nuclear material, including "yellowcake?" 1.8 metric tons of it, actually. Plus 500 tons of non weapons grade uranium? No? That slipped through the cracks? My my my. 
    Via Stop The ACLU, comes…

  28. Unintended consequences

    In an apparent attempt to assure control of congress passes to the Democrats this Tuesday, the New York Times has accused the Bush Administration of reckless disclosure of nuclear secrets by the publication of Iraqi documents captured after the 2003

  29. A Pinch Of A Mobius Loop

    This just in: there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but our releasing of the details of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program could benefit Iran. If that doesn’t sound internally consistent to you at first glance, you’re not…

  30. New York Times Validates Iraqi DID Have WMD’s .

    Once again New York Times manages to shoot itself, the Democratic party and it’s credibility in the head. In their pathetic attempt to once again influence the American public in the upcoming elections, they have managed to validate the evidence that…

  31. Mixed Emotions

    As our good friend mtl points out, the New York Times is running with a big story on how the “Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal” apparently posted very, very detailed nuclear documents for public consumption before being shut down aft…

  32. New York Times: Open mouth, insert foot, shoot foot, blame Bush

    Damn … there’s no way I can skip a post on this … Since we occupied Iraq three and a half years ago, we have found: brand-new chemical PPE designed for battlefield use over a dozen artillary shells containing cyclosarin

  33. New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program

    U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide Last March, the federal government set up a Web site to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war. The Bush administration did so under pressure

  34. If By October You Mean November

    I called the friends when I saw the Drudge teaser about a NY Times article on WMDs. I thought “By Golly They Found Them”…and the New York Times is reporting it.
    I was wrong.
    Last March, the federal government set up a Web site to ma…

  35. NYT – Admin Published Nuclear Secrets

    If you haven’t heard, the New York Times has published an article about the administration posting Iraqi documents which the Iranians (and I assume others) could use to create nuclear weapons.

  36. New York Times Confirms: Documents Reveal Saddam

    European diplomats said this week that some of those nuclear documents on the Web site were identical to the ones presented to the United Nations Security Council in late 2002, as America got ready to invade Iraq. But unlike those on the Web site, th…

  37. Is the NY Times about to score an own goal with claims Saddam had a nuclear weapons program?

    So it appears.  H/T Stop the ACLU
    Tomorrows paper will include this story:
    U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide
    Last March, the federal government set up a Web site to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the…

  38. NYT ~ Saddam’s Scientists On Verge Of Building Atom Bomb in 2002

    The New York Times may think they are reporting another “gotcha” on Bush….but, this is THE gotcha that Bush has for all of the war in Iraq naysayers!!!

  39. Saddam “on the Verge” of Getting a Nuke in 2002

    I don’t want to hear anymore “Bush lied, people died” talk. From today’s NY Times story on nuclear weapons information available on a government website of Iraqi documents we get this:
    Among the dozens of documents in English we…

  40. If Jihadists could Vote . . . it would be Democrat

    Resistance: the most important tool. And American citizens control to what extent their tool is used. Do we allow them to employ their tool or hold it for another day when they are even weaker? I’d hope for the latter. In the last several weeks, I ha…

  41. al QaQaa Part II

    Well now you couldn’t honestly expect the Traitor Times to sit on the sidelines days before an election now, could you? Not when it’s worked so hard this year to undermine our national security! This is alQaqaa Part II. That crap backfired on them i…

  42. So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit

    Over the past year or so, I have provided CQ readers with a number of translations from key Iraqi Intelligence Service documents that have been translated by either the FMSO or by Joseph Shahda of the Free Republic website. I…

  43. Times Inadvertently Admits Iraq Was Nuclear Lea

    Essentially, pre-2003 Iraq had more developed nuclear know-how than Iran and North Korea. This sustains the international belief that Saddam Hussein was indeed capable of and engaging in the development of a nuclear program.

  44. Important Admission By The New York Times

    I don’t know if this is their idea of an “October Surprise”, but if it is, it’s not going to turn out like the New York Times would have hoped.
    The article starts off by attempting to blast the government for putting sensitive documents online, but in

  45. “Bush lied, people died”?: challenging the critics

    A very common assertion has been, and unfortunately continues to be, that President Bush lied in order to “get” his war on Iraq. Herein I will discuss how these opponents have yet to prove or demonstrate their claims and how recent events e…

  46. Iraq and WMD verified by the New York Times

    It does seem crazy to have posted some of this data, but the Times seems to have buried the big news of the story. These documents verify how close Saddam was to actually building a successful nuclear weapon.

  47. It Was Iran All Along

    Running Updates . . . Tracking the latest on Drudge: Federal government set up Web site — Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal — to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war; detailed accounts of Iraq’s

  48. ‘Sheesh, You Mean Those Iraqi Docs Are Real?’

    That would be the moonbatty NY Times Reaction as they have finally found a reason to believe that the Saddam Hussein document repository as posted on a U.S. government website is real.
    Last March, the federal government set up a Web site to make publi…

  49. Nuclear preemption

    Today’s New York Times makes the case for war in Iraq by revealing that Saddam was only a year away from having nukes according to assessors at the United NationsThe Web site, “Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal,” was a constantly

  50. IRONY SO THICK YOU CAN BATHE IN IT

    The levels of irony on display with the “revelation” by the New York Times that some of the Saddam documents dealing with Hussein’s drive for nuclear weapons may constitute a dangerous release of classified info on how to build them …

  51. New York Times: Hussein months away from Nuke

    Oh, about those WMDs and close ties to Jihadi terrorists: Iraq had ’em, according to the Times (an Illustrated Guide)…

  52. So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit

    Over the past year or so, I have provided CQ readers with a number of translations from key Iraqi Intelligence Service documents that have been translated by either the FMSO or by Joseph Shahda of the Free Republic website. I…

  53. The New York Times’ November Suprise

    It just seems that the NYTimes doesn’t understand that they’re outclassed on this one and doesn’t understand the environment they’re operating in. Because they obviously think that they can get away with this crap.

  54. Another Bullet in the Old Gray Lady’s Ass

    Wait a minute… this can’t possibly be true; I thought Iraq was WMD free? I thought they weren’t neck deep in such things, instead content to fly kites and play with their pet bunnies, and overturning Hussein’s regime because of …

  55. Cry, The Beloved Stupid Country

    There are stupid people everywhere on earth. In most countries they quietly putter their lives away, trying to grow mangos in Nova Scotia and getting into occasional bar fights with people who tell them Jean-Luc Picard isn’t a real…

  56. Cry, The Beloved Stupid Country

    There are stupid people everywhere on earth. In most countries they quietly putter their lives away, trying to grow mangos in Nova Scotia and getting into occasional bar fights with people who tell them Jean-Luc Picard isn’t a real…

  57. Cry, The Beloved Stupid Country

    There are stupid people everywhere on earth. In most countries they quietly putter their lives away, trying to grow mangos in Nova Scotia and getting into occasional bar fights with people who tell them Jean-Luc Picard isn’t a real…

  58. NY Times Plans Exclusive Iraq Nuke Research Story Friday. *UPDATES*

    ***UPDATE – ARTICLE POSTED – A WHOLE LOT OF NOTHING. SCROLL FOR ANALYSIS*** *****UPDATE 11/3 8:41 AM ET – IF YOU READ ONE BLOG POST ON THIS MATTER, READ CAPTAIN ED’S – SCROLL FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS***** ***SCROLL FOR UPDATES*** Running…

  59. Where Are the WMD’s? NYT Has Them

    The Dying Old Lady, NYT, publishes an article showing Iraq was close to developing a nuclear bomb.
    No retraction of accusations, no apology for misleading the American people about WMD’s, no sense of decency. The NYT is a propagandist rag and sho…

  60. NYTimes: Bush told truth! Saddam a true threat! Yellowcake!

    “Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to …

  61. NY Times: Saddam 1 year away from Atomic Bomb

    Remember those millions of doccuments recovered after the fall of Saddam’s Regime? The ones which among other things clearly showed showed connections of Saddam’s regime to Al Qaeda in the early 90’s,  the continued development of d…

  62. So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit

    Over the past year or so, I have provided CQ readers with a number of translations from key Iraqi Intelligence Service documents that have been translated by either the FMSO or by Joseph Shahda of the Free Republic website. I…

  63. The Rabbit Hole

    Well, the Times now claims that the information published online included primers on how to build nuclear weapons – information that could prove useful to the likes of Iran. That is, if the Times reporting itself is correct. If the reporting is indee…

  64. The documents the Times authenticated: Illustrated

    Ever wondered what was in the cache of captured Iraqi documents (besides the plans that indicate Saddam was months away from having an atomic device)?

  65. APOLOGIZE TO THE PRESIDENT

    I think all those Democrats that denied that Iraq was an imminent threat and those that accused the President and Dick Cheney of deliberately misleading them and the American public, owe the President of the United States of America AN APOLOGY.
    How …

  66. The NYT Nuke Cookbook Story

    Early yesterday morning I emailed another blogger on an unrelated topic, but included my thoughts on the NYT’s story: I’m staying away from the NYT nuke story for now. The article was clear that the documents were pre-gulf war, I…

  67. NYT “Expose” PROVES Iraq WAS going Nuclear

    … You will recall of course the brouhaha about yellowcake in Niger, Colin Powell’s presentation to the UN, Joe Wilson, Valerie (Vanity Fair) Plame, blah, blah, blah… Well NOW—in an all out effort to torpedo Republican voter turnout–the Times i…

  68. The ‘No WMD’ Lie: NY Times Adds More Icing to Already-Baked Cake

    BizzyBlog readers know the argument over whether Saddam had weapons of mass destruction ended long ago (see Previous Posts list below).
    Thursday marked the one-year anniversary of the BizzyBlog post that got so many people riled up but that no one has …

  69. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  70. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  71. New York Times admits to WMD in Iraq!

    The Times has radically changed its position on the presence of a mature nuclear program in Iraq. Of course, they’re spinning this to hurt Bush, yet the New York Times now maintains that Iraq’s nuclear program was very close to…

  72. And Then There’s the Media…

    Well, here we go…
     
    In light of recent events, (of the “Kerry Sort”), I thought I’d start the rants with a rail against mainstream media… Seriously, are bloggers the only ones who “get it”? Consider the following…
    &nbsp…

Comments are closed.