« Powell: I'm No Casualty | Main | Why Not Just Have Nader Endorse Kerry? »
Michael Moore and Disney subsidiary Miramax found out that the Mouse meant what it said when it earlier told Miramax that it would not allow any Disney companies to distribute Moore's new film, Fahrenheit 911:
Disney executives indicated that they would not budge from their position forbidding Miramax to be the distributor of the film in North America. Overseas rights have been sold to a number of companies, executives said.
"We advised both the agent and Miramax in May of 2003 that the film would not be distributed by Miramax," said Zenia Mucha, a company spokeswoman, referring to Mr. Moore's agent. "That decision stands."
Typically for Moore's team, his agent tried to blame the Bush administrations (George and Jeb) for Disney's decision, claiming that Disney chief Michael Eisner told him that the distribution deal would endanger tax breaks at the federal and state (Florida) level:
"Michael Eisner asked me not to sell this movie to Harvey Weinstein; that doesn't mean I listened to him," [Ari] Emanuel said. "He definitely indicated there were tax incentives he was getting for the Disney corporation and that's why he didn't want me to sell it to Miramax. He didn't want a Disney company involved."
Just the measured commentary we've come to expect from the group that regularly puts fiction into its "documentaries". The Disney explanation makes more sense:
A senior Disney executive elaborated that the company had the right to quash Miramax's distribution of films if it deemed their distribution to be against the interests of the company. The executive said Mr. Moore's film is deemed to be against Disney's interests not because of the company's business dealings with the government but because Disney caters to families of all political stripes and believes Mr. Moore's film, which does not have a release date, could alienate many.
"It's not in the interest of any major corporation to be dragged into a highly charged partisan political battle," this executive said.
What's at stake is Harvey Weinstein's cut of the box office and his standing with the Democratic party, as Rutenberg alludes. Moore can now negotiate any distribution deal he likes, but Weinstein had set up a sweetheart deal that allowed he and Moore to lock up the North American profits between themselves, some of which would certainly find its way to party coffers.
This could have been avoided, of course, had Weinstein, Moore, and Emmanuel listened to Disney a year ago when they told them clearly that Disney would never distribute the film. Instead, they calculated that Disney would back down to avoid any negative publicity involved in rejecting Moore's work and allegations of political bias. However, it demonstrates the compartmentalization in which the Hollywood left lives if they thought that Disney's refusal to participate in Moore's work would somehow be more controversial than the opposite. Portraying the Disney corporation as a right-wing tool, given their support of many left-wing causes, will only underscore the radical nature of Hollywood and Moore's supporters.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Disney to Moore: Drop Dead:
» Who, Me? Partisan? from LeatherPenguin Blog
So the House of Mouse doesn't want their name anywhere near Moonbat Moore's National > Disney Forbidding Distribution of Film That Criticizes Bush" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/05/national/05DISN.html?ei=5006&en=89982416bdce50c0&ex=1084334400&p... [Read More]
Tracked on May 5, 2004 9:04 AM
» Disney Vs Moore from Crossing the Rubicon2
Disney is barring Miramax from distributing Michael Moore's latest movie. It is a business decision on Disney's part, but the Michael Moore crowd is of course going to cry politics. Captain's Quarters blog has a good analysis: This could have [Read More]
Tracked on May 5, 2004 9:42 AM
» A Conspiracy Theory from Shot In The Dark
The left is in a tizizzy over Disney's decision to bar Miramax from distributing Michael Moore's latest epic of paranoid neo-fiction movie. Disney's call - to follow through on its promist not to distribute "Fahrenheit 911" is being spun -... [Read More]
Tracked on May 5, 2004 3:46 PM
» The Other Nick Berg Video from Watcher of Weasels
The events surrounding Nick Berg's gruesome beheading were already weird enough...  but it also turns out that Berg had given Michael Moore a twenty-minute interview (which ultimately wasn't used) for the Bush-bashing mockumentary Fahrenheit 911.&n... [Read More]
Tracked on May 28, 2004 11:15 AM
» Ray Bradbury to Michael Moore: Screw You! from Watcher of Weasels
It turns out that Ray Bradbury is rather pissed off about having one of his book titles serve as the inspiration for Michael Moore in the naming of his Bush-bashing mockumentary, Farhenheit 911.  In a recent interview, Bradbury called Moore... [Read More]
Tracked on June 3, 2004 9:45 PM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!