« UN Report Whitewashes Sexual Abuse | Main | Soros Conviction Upheld In France »
The Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal of the Schindlers to get food and water restored to Terri Schiavo:
The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to order Terri Schiavo's feeding tube reinserted, rejecting a desperate appeal by her parents to keep their severely brain-damaged daughter alive.
The decision, announced in a terse one-page order, marked the end of a dramatic and disheartening four-day dash through the federal court system by Bob and Mary Schindler.
Justices did not explain their decision, which was at least the fifth time they have declined to get involved in the Schiavo case.
I'm not surprised by this action. I always felt that the only hope Terri had of getting relief was at the district court level. Once Judge Whittemore ignored Congress' express desire for a de novo retrial, I knew the effort was doomed.
I'll post more later. I hear that Jeb Bush wants to take physical custody of Terri, a move for which I have serious misgivings, but I don't really have any reasoned arguments for it yet. I need more time to absorb this.
UPDATE: Judge George Greer quashed Bush's motion for a custody transfer this afternoon:
A state judge refused Thursday to hear Gov. Jeb Bush's arguments to take custody of Terri Schiavo, leaving the brain-damaged woman's parents with only the slimmest hopes in their fight to keep her alive.
Bush's request cited new allegations of neglect and challenges the diagnoses that Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state, but Pinellas Circuit Judge George Greer wasn't convinced.
Not much surprise there, either, since Greer has been the only finder of fact throughout this entire case. However, I doubt that any other Florida court would have granted this particular motion, certainly not as injunctive relief. Before taking custody of a disabled person under any conditions, the state would have to show a high threshold of proof that state confiscation of a person and the termination of custody rights were warranted. That means a trial, not just a hearing; otherwise, it's a violation of habeas corpus, strictly speaking. Any lower threshold would enable the state (especially the executive) far too much leeway to confine people while the defendants suffered under the burden of proof.
I think this has been part of my misgiving about Jeb Bush's notion of protective custody from the beginning, but also I think I have a deeply-rooted fear of an overpowerful executive regardless. The courts have appellate courts above them, although certainly in this case they've mostly taken the cowardly way out and refused to look at the facts as well as the procedures. Legislatures answer directly to voters and in most cases could face recalls if they abuse their power. The same might be true of executives, but notwithstanding California's example, such a choke on power has proven exceedingly difficult to engineer. The executives have the agencies of law enforcement under their command, with their near-monopoly on legal lethal force. An out-of-control executive is a far greater danger than any of the other branches in the long run.
I'm still conflicted on it. However, practically speaking, it won't happen anyway. We've sentenced a woman to die in a manner which we wouldn't dream of ordering for a dangerous animal or a convicted terrorist, and now we have to watch as the people who supposedly should be protecting her force her to die horribly. I'm praying for Terri and the Schindlers, but I think that's all that's left.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference All Over But The Dying:
» Surpeme Court Won't Act On Terri Sciavo from Secure Liberty
This shouldn't suprise anybody. (H/T Captain Ed) The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to order Terri Schiavo's feeding tube reinserted, rejecting a desperate appeal by her parents to keep their severely brain-damaged daughter alive. The decision, ... [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 10:18 AM
» State Sanctioned Murder has arrived... from Kevin McCullough
I'm not surprised by this action. I always felt that the only hope Terri had of getting relief was at the district court level. Once Judge Whittemore ignored Congress' express desire for a de novo retrial, I knew the effort was doomed. [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 10:53 AM
» Confused by The Twinkie-meister from Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler
Oliver "The Twinkie-meister" Willis keeps saying that this Terri Schiavo thing is all about politics and raising money for right-wing, fundie causes. But, he then points to a poll that says that majority of Americans want the feeding tube out. (Ollie... [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 1:02 PM
» Road Rage on Pennsylvania Avenue from Vote for Judges
It was abundantly clear that two of those branches determined that Schiavo should not be allowed to die until the courts took a fresh look at the case. And it's also clear that the third branch flipped the bird at the other two. [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 1:40 PM
» Over And Out? from Ed Driscoll.com
The Supreme Court has rejected the Terri Schiavo case. It's apparently down to Florida's Gov. Jeb Bush, but his options are rapidly dwindling as well. Update: Ed Morrissey has updated information in a post succinctly titled, "All Over But The... [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 4:57 PM
» The Springerization of Life (and Death) in the United States from A Goy and his Blog
I've been resisting writing about the Terri Schiavo controversy for a number of reasons. Primarily, up until last night, I didn't feel informed enough to have more than a gut response to the notion of someone being purposely starved to death. Seconda... [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 6:13 PM
» If things were different from NixGuy.com
CQ sure sounds a bitter melancholy note that speaks for most of us: We've sentenced a woman to die in a manner which we wouldn't dream of ordering for a dangerous animal or a convicted terrorist, and now we have to watch as the people who supposed... [Read More]
Tracked on March 24, 2005 8:05 PM
» Did anybody actually read S. 653?? from A Bluegrass Blog
Ann Althouse makes a point that I've been trying to make in comments on blogs and in conversations about the Schiavo case. Put as simply as possible, the federal courts did not ignore the federal statute in declining a request [Read More]
Tracked on March 25, 2005 12:56 PM
Tracked on March 26, 2005 5:38 AM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!