« Durbin Apologizes Weakly A Week Later (Updated!) | Main | New, Improved Heritage Foundation Panel For July 8th! »
Britain issued a warning against trusting Ali Akbar Rafsanjani as a reformist voice, reminding people of Rafsanjani's role in implementing some of the most repressive of the policies of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The unusually harsh diplomatic language comes as Iranian reformist groups debate whether to boycott elections altogether or band together to keep hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from the presidency:
The wily cleric, who served as president from 1989 to 1997, has cast himself as a centrist, and has dropped several hints that he was open to dealing with America.
But a senior British diplomat dismissed Mr Rafsanjani's reputation as a "pragmatist", and cast doubt over whether he would make it easier to resolve the crisis over Teheran's nuclear programme.
"It's important that people do not see Rafsanjani as a white knight. He has been president for eight years, and a lot of bad things happened in those eight years," he said. "He does not have a record of reform, co-operation with the West or abiding by international standards.
"We hear what he says, and we like it. But there is a difference between talking the talk and walking the walk."
Britain's warning is well taken. The Telegraph reminds its readers that Rafsanjani used to run the Iranian secret police, and may have ordered the killings of scores of dissidents during the worst days of Khomeini's reign. No one at Downing Street apparently buys into the notion that Rafsanjani has mellowed into a democrat.
For that matter, they're not buying into Jack Straw's analysis of Iran as an "emerging democracy" any more, either. The obviously rigged election has revealed Straw's wishful thinking as hopelessly naive. The only benefit this election has had is to make clear that the Guardian Council rules Iran just as absolutely as the Politburo once did the Soviet Union.
Earlier today, I recommended that reform-minded Iranians should just boycott the polling centers if they wanted to send a message. According to Publius Pundit, they actually did that during the first round -- but the Guardian Council simply published bogus numbers instead. If people find that hard to believe, Robert Mayer has the photographs.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Britain: Rafsanjani No Reformer:
Tracked on June 21, 2005 11:24 PM
» Sudden Lucidity in the Land of Benny Hill from Hard Starboard
Look who is expressing almost knee-jerk skepticism at the likely restoration of Ali Akbar Rafsanjani to his formerly held post of Iranian figurehead (er, president) - one of the "EU3" powers that has been five-knuckle-shuffling for months with the mu... [Read More]
Tracked on June 22, 2005 11:30 AM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!