« IRA To Renounce Violence | Main | Independent? Really? »
Have the Democrats settled on an Estradification of Supreme Court nominee John Roberts? It certainly appear so. The White House offered to release 75,000 pages of documents relating to Roberts and his tenure at the Reagan and Bush 41 administrations, but the Democrats don't find that number acceptable:
"This in no way satisfies any potential document request," said one Democratic aide, generally reflecting the sentiments of Senate Democrats. "The White House has artfully made it look like they are saying yes to our requests, when they are actually saying no."
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee wrote President Bush late yesterday saying they are "disappointed" in the decision to cut off access to "important and informative documents written" by Judge Roberts. Those documents, they said, may be necessary to "evaluate Judge Robert's judicial philosophy and legal reasoning."
The White House has refused to release federal Judge Roberts' papers from his time as deputy solicitor general in the first Bush White House, saying that doing so would violate attorney-client privilege and set a dangerous precedent for judicial nominees. The Solicitor General's Office is the federal government's lawyer in cases that come before the Supreme Court. ...
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, responded to the offer by saying the Senate -- not the White House -- will decide what it needs.
"If the White House announcement is intended to begin a dialogue about documents, I welcome it," he said. "If it is intended to unilaterally pre-empt a discussion about documents the Senate may need and is entitled to, then this is a regrettable beginning."
Despite the protests of all living former Solicitors General, including several Democrats, against the release of privileged material to the Senate or anyone else, the Democratic leadership will continue to press for these documents in open disregard for attorney-client confidentiality. To call these documents red herrings gives them too high a status. The internal memoranda that the Democrats demand to see will reveal advice given by the SG office on specific cases which the former administrations fought in the federal appellate courts. The SG does not create policy; it merely represents those that do, and in order to do so effectively, they must discuss the ramifications of policy with the administration. Unless Roberts actually worked in the administration in a policy-development position, then these writings don't have any relevance whatsoever. Roberts wasn't even the Solicitor General, just one of the deputies.
So why do the Democrats demand to see these documents? Primarily because they know their release would be inappropriate. They can therefore paint the administration as secretive and uncooperative in the confirmation process and hope to build enough public support to get a filibuster through without triggering the Byrd option. Frist and the Republicans should make it clear that this is a pipe dream. Any fail to reach cloture should result in a rule change eliminating the filibuster in all future judicial confirmations as promised in the spring.
It won't happen, of course, because the centrist Democrats realize that this will result in losing their last bit of leverage in the process. The confirmation will continue on track, with a few delays for bloviating, but in the end any filibuster will fail and Roberts will get around 70 votes for confirmation. The only question will be how long it takes to get there.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 75,000 Isn't Enough:
» The John Roberts Nomination Circus from bRight & Early
bRight & Early is SupportingFreedom Alliance in Blogathon 2005Please Register and Donate One week. President Bush announced his nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court one week ago and as sure as Christmas decorations are about to show u... [Read More]
Tracked on July 27, 2005 11:56 AM
» Today's Links and Minifeatures 2005 07 27 Wednesday from Searchlight Crusade
Carnival of the Vanities is up! Especially good Open Challenge to the Detractors of Rep. Tom Tancr... [Read More]
Tracked on July 27, 2005 5:48 PM
» Crap So Thick You Could Walk On It from Hard Starboard
Getting back to the Chappaquidick Kid's fishing expedition, the White House has offered to release 75,000 pages of Robert's related documents from his service in the Reagan and Bush41 Administrations. Is that enough for the Democrats? Are you kidding... [Read More]
Tracked on July 27, 2005 8:37 PM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!