Captain's Quarters Blog

« What'd I Say? Don't Ask The New York Times | Main | Power Line Goes MSM »

August 10, 2005
CNN, Keeping Their Viewers (Mis)Informed (Updated & Bumped)

The controversy over NARAL's advertisement opposing the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court may not do the damage that the pro-abortion lobbying group desired, but it may well bury what's left of CNN's credibility. After taking a beating today when the nonpartisan site called its claims that Roberts supported violence against women "false" and "especially misleading", NARAL still managed to sell the advertisement to a television channel -- and not just any TV station, but supposedly truth-based CNN, according to the Drudge Report:

CNN has reviewed and agreed to run a controversial ad produced by a pro-abortion groups that falsely accuses Supreme Court nominee John Roberts of filing legal papers supporting a convicted abortion clinic bomber, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The news network has agreed to a $125,000 ad buy from NARAL for a commercial which depicts a bombed out 1998 Birmingham, AL abortion clinic. The Birmingham clinic was bombed seven years after Roberts signed the legal briefing the ad question!

That just starts the smear, according to the Annenberg group Factcheck, which denounces the ad in no uncertain terms:

An abortion-rights group is running an attack ad accusing Supreme Court nominee John Roberts of filing legal papers supporting . . . a convicted clinic bomber and of having an ideology that leads him to excuse violence against other Americans It shows images of a bombed clinic in Birmingham , Alabama .

The ad is false.

And the ad misleads when it says Roberts supported a clinic bomber. It is true that Roberts sided with the bomber and many other defendants in a civil case, but the case didn't deal with bombing at all. Roberts argued that abortion clinics who brought the suit had no right use an 1871 federal anti-discrimination statute against anti-abortion protesters who tried to blockade clinics. Eventually a 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court agreed, too. Roberts argued that blockades were already illegal under state law.

The images used in the ad are especially misleading. The pictures are of a clinic bombing that happened nearly seven years after Roberts signed the legal brief in question.

NARAL still insists that its advertisement is accurate. However, Factcheck provides a transcript right on its page which it refutes in almost every sentence contained in the ad. Read all of the Factcheck post in order to see just how dishonest NARAL got in its smear campaign.

And CNN now wants to run the ad for NARAL. That tells you how much CNN values their own credibility.

More in a moment. I'm going on the Hugh Hewitt show to discuss this.

UPDATE: Carol Platt Liebau and Peter Robinson filled in for Hugh this week, and we discussed what CNN could do to avoid the inevitable backlash it will suffer from running an ad so filled with falsehoods and smears. My prediction will be that CNN sees the outrage this ad has generated and reconsiders. However, it will issue a press release saying that Drudge's report was premature and that CNN did not agree to the ad sale at all.

If CNN runs this ad after the easy refutation on display at Factcheck, the remaining shreds of credibility they retain will dissipate, revealing themselves to be nothing but shills for the Left.

UPDATE II: I missed this in the Post article:

The NARAL ad, set to begin airing tomorrow on local channels in Maine and Rhode Island and nationally on the CNN and Fox News cable networks, features Emily Lyons, a clinic director who was badly injured when a bomb exploded at her clinic in Birmingham in 1998.

Shame, shame, shame on Fox News as well. What are they trying to prove -- that they can get as corrupt as CNN?

UPDATE III and BUMP: Radioblogger has the transcript of my appearance on Hugh Hewitt's show last night. Also, regarding Fox News, I'm hearing that Fox has NOT sold national advertising time to NARAL for this ad, but that individual Fox Broadcasting outlets have done so in a few markets. These broadcast outlets have agreed to air the smear spot, but not their networks:



Presque Isle


Notice that NARAL appears to target Maine and Rhode Island. It looks like an attempt to persuade Lincoln Chaffee, Susan Collins, and Olympia Snowe to abandon Roberts.

UPDATE IV: Radioblogger has the official CNN response:

Ms. Goldberg sent me an e-mail with CNN's statement regarding the decision to air the NARAL spot. Here it is:

CNN accepts advocacy advertising from responsible groups from across the political spectrum who wish to express their views and their opinions about issues of public importance. So that viewers can further research the claims being made within the ads, the messages must identify the name of the sponsoring organizations, usually by displaying a website address.

Within CNN news programs, the more prominent and newsworthy advocacy advertisements will be reported on, fact checked and debated.

They aren't as smart as I thought they were. Perhaps they figure to pick up some respect for not backing away from NARAL, but as Duane asks, just how can one square the qualifier "responsible" with the people who produced this smear of an ad?

UPDATE V and BUMP TO TOP AGAIN: The Media Blog at NRO confirms what I heard this morning -- that Fox did not sell any airtime to NARAL:

A Fox News spokesman just told me, "[NARAL] actually never approached us for a buy. Youll see a correction in the Washington Post tomorrow." So Fox News will not be running the false ad. However, CNN seems to be supplementing its "this ad is not totally outrageous" defense with a soupon of "everyone is doing it." Neither defense holds up.

Ken Mehlman appeared on the new Situation Room to blast the advertisement, Media Blog reports. I'll have to double-check the transcripts later, even if Abbi Tatton and Jackie Schechner didn't mention this post (read MB's entire post to see why I say that!).

UPDATE VI: MB@NRO followed up with Dan Balz, who wrote the Washington Post piece. He told MB that his source on the Fox buy was ... NARAL. So much for being a "responsible" group, although the Washington Post certainly is -- Balz promises a correction in tomorrow's edition.

Sphere It Digg! View blog reactions
Posted by Ed Morrissey at August 10, 2005 5:25 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CNN, Keeping Their Viewers (Mis)Informed (Updated & Bumped):

» Let the scare tactics begin-Update from Sister Toldjah
As an update to this blog entry, where I posted about NARAL’s scare tactics via running a nasty ad against Supreme Court nominee Judge John Roberts, FactCheck has criticized this ad claiming [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 7:51 PM

» The Roberts Confirmation Battle from bRight & Early
While the confirmation hearings for John Roberts to replace Sandra Day O'Conner on the Supreme Court are less than a month from their start, the efforts to discredit him have begun. (Some say even before he was named). Confirm Them examines the first... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 8:45 PM

» NARAL Lies about Judge Roberts from The Unalienable Right
You wonder what depths people will sink to in order to defeat a nominee they fear will adhere to the written words of the Constitution? Here’s one example. The pro-abortion group NARAL has produced a despicable ad that blatantly lies about Ju... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 9:03 PM

» NARAL Is Nuts from The Strata-Sphere
Here is NARAL’s 3rd grade attempt at claiming Judge Roberts ’supports’ fringe anti-abortion groups: he supports the right to free speech. The first TV ad opposing federal Judge John Roberts’ nomination to the Supreme Court ig... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 9:11 PM

» Will CNN run dishonest NARAL ad? from LyfLines
Roberts, for the U. S. Government, filed an amicus brief in Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic, arguing that "federal anti-discrimination law couldn't be used against abortion blockaders because they weren't discriminating against women –... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 9:23 PM

» Blogstorm brewing over NARAL anti-Roberts ad from Conservative Musings
The latest in anti-Roberts nomination ads has been produced by NARAL. Blogs currently carrying stories on the ad are Drudge, Captain's Quarters, and Carol Platt Liebau. Carol has also brought it up on Hugh Hewitt's radio show, where she is filling-in... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 9:30 PM

» NARAL Ad To Run On CNN, Fox from The Politicker
Per Captain's Quarters comes news that the contraversial ad from NARAL about Judge Roberts will run on CNN and Fox News. The ad, sponsored by NARAL Pro-Choice America, focuses on Roberts's role in a case involving whether a 19th-century anti-Ku... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 9:34 PM

» CNN to Run False Ad from Slublog
How much is credibility worth? NARAL has created an anti-John Roberts advertisement that contains false statements, and CNN has agreed to run it.An abortion-rights group is running an attack ad accusing Supreme Court nominee John Roberts of filing lega... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 10:08 PM

» Let the Borking Begin! from Another Rovian Conspiracy - St Wendeler
Unfortunately for the whackjobs at NARAL, this isn't 1987, Roberts isn't Bork (compare / contrast), and there is plenty of folks that will shoot down their idiotic attempts to smear and slander John Roberts. [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 10:45 PM

» The MSM Bias, Update from Flopping Aces
This is so pathetic in a number of ways. That CNN is willing to throw away it's last ounce of credibility (Not sure if they have an ounce left...maybe a few CC's) or the fact that NARAL is so full of moonbats that they don't care if they lie, as long... [Read More]

Tracked on August 9, 2005 11:29 PM

» A Real Smear Campaign from Dangerous Dan
Yesterday, I noted Stephen Elliot’s silly accusation that there’s a smear campaign against Cindy Sheehan merely because people brought up something she publicly said in the past. Well, now we can see a real smear campaign at work. Pro-ab... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 1:02 AM

» Inaccurate NARAL Ad to run on CNN from Black Sheep Press
CNN has reviewed and agreed to run a controversial ad produced by a pro-abortion group’s that falsely accuses Supreme Court nominee John Roberts of filing legal papers supporting a convicted abortion clinic bomber, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 1:07 AM

» Abortion Group To Bomb Roberts Over Abortion Bomb from Point Five
...“Judge Roberts needs to learn that killing is not the answer to life’s problems,” said NARAL spokeswoman Gloria Felts. To that end, the group has called for the killing of John Roberts... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 10:05 AM

» CNN to run NARAL slime ad from Danny Carlton: codenamed "Jack Lewis"
From the Drudge Report... CNN has reviewed and agreed to run a controversial ad produced by a pro-abortion group that... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 10:28 AM

» Another John G. Roberts headshaker? from Weblog
You know, it'll be more than one fringe-right group ditching this guy if he keeps it up. Today, the story on John Roberts' repudiation of Justice Sunday. While his picture gets more complicated, let the blog-right backpedal begin: Ron Wyden... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 11:10 AM

» The 'Bloggy Call To Action' That Backfired from Beltway Blogroll
You know blogs have power when advocacy outfits like the National Abortion Right Action League start urging the grassroots to take their appeals to the top bloggers. That's exactly what NARAL did at its Bush v. Choice blog several days... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 11:51 AM

» Links and Minifeatures 08 10 (Wednesday) from Searchlight Crusade
Teens urged to be future thinkers. Contest with kind of cool prize.

Iraq/War on Terror

[Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 4:06 PM

» This is why the blogosphere is so good from The House Of Wheels
Now normally, I wouldn't have a problem with a TV network running an ad for a left-wing group; they're entitled to free speech. However I don't believe free speech extends to lying in a deliberate effort to slander someone's reputation, and that's exac... [Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 6:31 PM

» Linkfest from Right Thoughts

I keep meaning to blog on all this stuff, but I am so burned out on writing and whatnot. I actually fear for the podcast this week, I have ZERO ideas and ZERO incentive or desire to be creative and funny this week. I just feel...used up. It's n...

[Read More]

Tracked on August 10, 2005 9:00 PM

» Food For Thought From the Right from scoopstories
I'm making a few changes to the blog over the next few days, from updating the blogroll to changing the list of books I'm reading (those three covers listed are the next three books I'm tackling) to getting rid of [Read More]

Tracked on August 11, 2005 7:02 AM

» A missed opportunity on both sides from The Flag of the World
Looking for further evidence of the disintigration of the Moderate wing of the Democratic party? Of course you are. Well, it's easy to find. Today brings us a missed opportunity of epic proportions. You've heard, I expect, of the outrageous anti-Jo... [Read More]

Tracked on August 12, 2005 12:24 AM

Design & Skinning by:
m2 web studios

blog advertising


Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!