« Extremism Will Not Win Elections | Main | How Many Bali Bombings Before Indonesia Takes It Seriously? »
Earlier, I warned about the approach taken by some conservatives to rely so publicly on the evangelicalism of Harriet Miers could create a political environment that we will later rue legitimizing. E.J. Dionne notices my post and picks up on the contrariness of Republican objections to their righteous anger at Democratic criticisms of appointees based on their "deeply held personal beliefs" and their push to note Miers' dedication to her religion now:
Shortly after Bush named John Roberts to the Supreme Court, a few Democrats, including Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), suggested that the nominee might reasonably be questioned about the impact of his religious faith on his decisions as a justice.
Durbin had his head taken off. "We have no religious tests for public office in this country," thundered Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), insisting that any inquiry about a potential judge's religious views was "offensive." Fidelis, a conservative Catholic group, declared that "Roberts' religious faith and how he lives that faith as an individual has no bearing and no place in the confirmation process."
But now that Harriet Miers, Bush's latest Supreme Court nominee, is in trouble with conservatives, her religious faith and how she lives that faith are becoming central to the case being made for her by the administration and its supporters. Miers has almost no public record. Don't worry, the administration's allies are telling their friends on the right, she's an evangelical Christian.
When members of the Democratic caucus used religion, disguising it as they did, to filibuster people like John Roberts and Janice Rogers Brown for their staunch Catholocism, everyone knew it -- and we Republicans rightly called them out for conducting religious tests for office. Well, religious tests work both ways. One cannot eat their cake and have it too on questions of faith as prerequisites for office. Either it's off limits and no one uses religious affiliations to deny or promote candidates, or we start having open wars over the nature and truth of religion on every candidate sent for Senatorial confirmation.
Do we really want to use Congress for this kind of debate? No; it will take an already divisive process and start the kind of debilitating social stress that the Founders wanted to avoid in Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution. Congress does not exist to pursue the True Religion or the Meaning of Creation; it exists to provide rules of law that the Executive enforces and that the Judiciary considers when ruling on cases brought before it.
If Miers' evangelicalism remains the top selling point of her nomination, then I submit that the White House has already lost this battle. They need to stop promoting religion as a legitimate point of consideration on Miers' curriculum vitae, or else conservative nominations will face nothing less than an Inquisition on every confirmation -- an Inquisition endorsed by the foolishness of short-sighted conservatives.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dionne Notes Chickens Coming Home To Roost:
» Disagreeing With Ed And Betsy from Cheat-Seeking Missiles
Capt. Ed and Betsy agree with E.J. Dionne, Jr. that one can't chastise Dems for questioning Roberts' faith, then assure conservatives that Miers is OK because she's a conservative Christian. Intimidating as the company is, Dionne excepted, I beg to ... [Read More]
Tracked on October 7, 2005 9:45 AM
» Fly By 10/07/05 from The Strata-Sphere
For all the hand wringers out there concerned about the Miers nomination and what kind of judge Bush picked, all you need to do to calm your nerves and halt the infighting is ponder this page… Relax already. Rush Limbaugh made one of the dumbe... [Read More]
Tracked on October 7, 2005 10:37 AM
» Damn Christians from reverse_vampyr
More grist for the mill. If she doesn't drool at the thought of disembowling fetuses, we just can't have her on the bench. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that Harriet Miers is a good candidate for the Supreme Court vacancy left by Sandra Day O... [Read More]
Tracked on October 7, 2005 1:28 PM
» “Faith-Based Hypocrisy” from The Unalienable Right
As painful as it might be to admit, E.J. Dionne has gotten it right in his column today criticizing those conservatives who cite Harriet Miers’ Christian beliefs as reason to support her confirmation to the Supreme Court. His opening paragraph i... [Read More]
Tracked on October 7, 2005 5:54 PM
» The Faith Card from ProfessorBainbridge.com
Joe Gandelman points us to a WaPo article suggesting that the White House's new strategy for salvaging Harriet Miers' SCOTUS nomination will be to play the faith card:... the White House plans to regain the upper hand by focusing on [Read More]
Tracked on October 7, 2005 6:07 PM
» Religion and politics. from Antisemantics
As the old saying goes, religion and politics don't mix. And they don't miss because of the Goose and Gander Law -- which, like Murphy's law and every attendant corollary, cannot be gotten around. I'd been thinking about that lately thanks to the Meirs... [Read More]
Tracked on October 7, 2005 9:21 PM
Tracked on October 7, 2005 10:29 PM
» Is Miers Nomination Becoming A Religious Test? Forsooth! from Opinion Times
Much of the current discussion in support of the Harriet Miers nomination is aiming at establishing lagging support among the Republican, conservative base. To do so, the Bush Administration and its spokesmen are pointing to her Christian faith as a ... [Read More]
Tracked on October 8, 2005 12:05 AM
» faith, agendas and the supreme court from f/k/a (formerly ethicalEsq)
Rather than silencing all talk of religion for fear of liberal "Inquisitions", this is a perfect time to help delineate the proper role of questions concerning the impact of religion on [Read More]
Tracked on October 8, 2005 12:46 AM
» Shakier & Shakier from Hard Starboard
For that handful of Bush-backers who "want to believe" and are desperate for any excuse to give the President the benefit of the doubt on his nomination of his underwhelming friend Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court, things are not getting any e... [Read More]
Tracked on October 8, 2005 7:33 PM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!