« French Riots Abating Or Adopting New Tactics? | Main | Will The DoJ Probe The CIA For CYA? »
Paul Martin pulled out Santa Claus as a reason to avoid a no-confidence motion this month in the Commons and to save his shaky grip on power for at least another two months. Meanwhile, the NDP and the Tories came closer to agreeing on a strategy that will guarantee an election in the winter that should closely follow the release of the second Gomery report:
Mr. Martin said he didn't understand the current rush for an election. Mr. Martin has promised to call an election within 30 days of the release of the final report from Judge Gomery on the sponsorship scandal. That report is due in February. He also said Canadians don't want a Christmas election.
"You know, they want to see Santa Claus, they don't want to see politicians," Mr. Martin said. ...
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper told reporters on Wednesday it was now clear that any agreement between the Liberals and the NDP had fallen by the wayside and he called the NDP proposal "innovative."
"I spoke to Mr. Layton," he said. "He is committed to bring down this government. It's a very innovative proposal that tries to address some of the concerns that we do share about the business of Parliament and the timing of the election."
Layton's plan would use an NDP opposition day to demand new elections from the executive. Instead of relying on a traditional no-confidence motion, the motion would be non-binding but could be used to build a precedent for a subsequent binding demand for an immediate call for elections. That would allow Parliament to remain in session for several weeks to get business accomplished. The timimg would force Martin to stick to his promise to have elections within 30 days of the next Gomery release.
Harper and the Conservatives appear to endorse this approach, which may be a mistake. They had an opportunity to end the Martin government directly and on the main issue of corruption simply by calling for a new government in a no-confidence motion, an honest and ethical approach that would contrast not only with Liberal behavior during Adscam but also with NDP's dirty agreement with the Liberal power brokers last spring -- the same ones in key positions during the height of the Sponsorship Programme, not so coincidentally. Playing footsie now may turn out to be necessary, but it does diminish the ethical quality of the electoral demands Harper so eloquently made earlier this week.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Promise Them Santa Claus, But Give Them Paul Martin:
» Grits Gone Wild from Big Lizards
Captain Ed Morrissey of Captain's Quarters is the man to follow for anything related to the struggle up north between Paul Martin's Liberal Party on the one side, and on the other, the Conservative Party's Stephen Harper, the the (basically... [Read More]
Tracked on November 14, 2005 5:02 PM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!