« Administration Official Told Bob Woodward About Plame's CIA Role Before Leak: Post | Main | Alito Application Causes Twitters Instead Of Tidal Waves »
American management of the Internet dodged another challenge at a UN-sponsored summit on information systems. The attendees voted to continue American oversight through ICANN of the Internet, avoiding a protracted legal and political battle over freedom of speech and a number of other issues:
Negotiators from more than 100 countries agreed late Tuesday to leave the United States in charge of the Internet's addressing system, averting a U.S.-EU showdown at this week's U.N. technology summit.
U.S. officials said early Wednesday that instead of transferring management of the system to an international body such as the United Nations, an international forum would be created to address concerns. The forum, however, would have no binding authority.
U.S. Assistant Secretary of Commerce Michael Gallagher said the deal means the United States will leave day-to-day management to the private sector, through a quasi-independent organization called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN.
It would be difficult to imagine a more costly setback to the cause of freedom than to allow the UN or a similary forum to gain control of the servers that run the Internet. Too many governments around the world would use that power to stifle dissent among their own people. The Internet, to the extent that the oppressed have access to it at all, provides the eye to the world that freedom fighters need to remain motivated to keep up the struggle and the contacts which can make the struggle successful.
The American laissez-faire attitude towards content creates many problems regarding spam and p0rn, but it also guarantees the broadest latitude for political speech and debate. Given the UN's rather strange ideas about committee assignments, it doesn't take much imagination to picture an "independent" international committee in charge of the Internet headed by China and including such free-speech lovers as Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe, Brazil, Libya, and Cuba outweighing the US on critical access decisions.
The Internet is not the Panama Canal. We created it, and we should continue to run it. Any President who agreed to give it away should plan on keeping his or her bags packed and ready at the exit of the White House.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Internet Dodges Dictators One More Time:
» SLIME TIME NEWS from The Heretik
NEWS WITH OOZE tm. Big surprise. Oil Execs met with Cheney on energy policy back in the day and lied about it yesterday. Or was it last week? Or has it been all along? [story] More at The Nitpicker, [Read More]
Tracked on November 16, 2005 10:57 AM
» U.N. Drops Attempt to Steal Internet Control from Donkey Stomp
This is great news! The idea of the U.N. having control over our freedoms when it comes to the Internet is a scary proposition. High and unfair taxes along with strict restrictions have been avoided. [Read More]
Tracked on November 16, 2005 2:40 PM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!