Captain's Quarters Blog


« Does The University Of Minnesota Discriminate Against Conservatives? | Main | Liberating The RCMP »

February 16, 2006
Is This Our New Security Initiative?

Michelle Malkin points out a disturbing turn of events in the war on terror: the surrender of port management to Arab-based firms. A little-known oversight panel at Treasury has approved a $7B deal which will put the state-owned Dubai Ports World in charge of six major American ports:

The Bush administration on Thursday rebuffed criticism about potential security risks of a $6.8 billion sale that gives a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.

Lawmakers asked the White House to reconsider its earlier approval of the deal.

The sale to state-owned Dubai Ports World was "rigorously reviewed" by a U.S. committee that considers security threats when foreign companies seek to buy or invest in American industry, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones said.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, run by the Treasury Department, reviewed an assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies. The committee's 12 members agreed unanimously the sale did not present any problems, the department said.

"We wanted to look at this one quite closely because it relates to ports," Stewart Baker, an assistant secretary in the Homeland Security Department, told The Associated Press. "It is important to focus on this partner as opposed to just what part of the world they come from. We came to the conclusion that the transaction should not be halted."

The unusual defense of the secretive committee, which reviews hundreds of such deals each year, came in response to criticism about the purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.

The world's fourth-largest ports company runs commercial operations at shipping terminals in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

Dubai is part of the United Arab Emirates, a collection of authoritarian regimes considered friendly to the US and the West. However, UAE has had its troubles with Islamists in the past, as Michelle points out. In fact, the 9/11 Commission notes UAE involvement in Islamist terrorism in several spots.

Page 138: "Even after Bin Ladin’s departure from the area, CIA officers hoped he might return, seeing the camp as a magnet that could draw him for as long as it was still set up.The military maintained readiness for another strike opportunity.160 On March 7, 1999, [Richard] Clarke called a UAE official to express his concerns about possible associations between Emirati officials and Bin Ladin.Clarke later wrote in a memorandum of this conversation that the call had been approved at an interagency meeting and cleared with the CIA." [This involved Clarke blowing a cover on a covert operation.]

Page 167: "In early 2000,Atta, Jarrah, and Binalshibh returned to Hamburg. Jarrah arrived first, on January 31, 2000.97 According to Binalshibh, he and Atta left Kandahar together and proceeded first to Karachi, where they met KSM and were instructed by him on security and on living in the United States. Shehhi apparently had already met with KSM before returning to the UAE.Atta returned to Hamburg in late February, and Binalshibh arrived shortly thereafter. Shehhi’s travels took him to the UAE (where he acquired a new passport and a U.S. visa), Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and one or more other destinations."

Page 171: "Bin Ladin relied on the established hawala networks operating in Pakistan, in Dubai, and throughout the Middle East to transfer funds efficiently."

Page 216: "On June 20, Hanjour returned home to Saudi Arabia. He obtained a U.S. student visa on September 25 and told his family he was returning to his job in the UAE. Hanjour did go to the UAE, but to meet facilitator Ali Abdul
Aziz Ali.62"

Page 224: "The Hamburg operatives paid for their flight training primarily with funds wired from Dubai by KSM’s nephew,Ali Abdul Aziz Ali. Between June 29 and September 17, 2000,Ali sent Shehhi and Atta a total of $114,500 in five transfers ranging from $5,000 to $70,000."

Page 236: "After training in Afghanistan, the operatives went to a safehouse maintained by KSM in Karachi and stayed there temporarily before being deployed to the United States via the UAE. ... Ali apparently assisted nine
future hijackers between April and June 2001 as they came through Dubai. He helped them with plane tickets, traveler’s checks, and hotel reservations; he also taught them about everyday aspects of life in the West, such as purchasing clothes and ordering food. Dubai, a modern city with easy access to a major airport, travel agencies, hotels, and Western commercial establishments,was an ideal transit point."

In fact, many of the 9/11 hijackers transited through the UAE, and a significant amount of al-Qaeda cash came through UAE-based accounts. If they run their own country's borders so poorly, why would we trust them to run ours? The White House needs to deep-six this deal, or cancel the contracts and re-bid them. Putting our ports in the hands of Arab authoritarians isn't just putting the fox in charge of the henhouse, it's tantamount to cooking him eggs for breakfast every morning and bringing him KFC for supper every night.

Sphere It Digg! View blog reactions
Posted by Ed Morrissey at February 16, 2006 10:59 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is This Our New Security Initiative?:

» US Ports Update from Kim Priestap
Scroll down for updates. In a post from a few days ago, I expressed my shock that the US government approved the transfer of port operations from P O, a London based port management company that manages several ports in the US, to Dubai Ports World, an... [Read More]

Tracked on February 17, 2006 1:02 PM

» Hey Buddy, Wanna Buy a Port? from Suitably Flip
It does strike me as odd that the development of commercial research facilities constitutes sufficiently vital public use to warrant seizure of private homes, but that the ports of New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia ar... [Read More]

Tracked on February 17, 2006 1:21 PM

» Hey Buddy, Wanna Buy a Port? from Suitably Flip
It does strike me as odd that the development of commercial research facilities constitutes sufficiently vital public use to warrant seizure of private homes, but that the ports of New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia ar... [Read More]

Tracked on February 17, 2006 1:23 PM

» Quote of the Day: American Ports from Gina Cobb
Putting our ports in the hands of Arab authoritarians isn't just putting the fox in charge of the henhouse, it's tantamount to cooking him eggs for breakfast every morning and bringing him KFC for supper every night. (Ed Morrissey, Captain's Quarters) ... [Read More]

Tracked on February 17, 2006 1:39 PM

» Quote of the Day: American Ports from Gina Cobb
Putting our ports in the hands of Arab authoritarians isn't just putting the fox in charge of the henhouse, it's tantamount to cooking him eggs for breakfast every morning and bringing him KFC for supper every night. (Ed Morrissey, Captain's Quarters) ... [Read More]

Tracked on February 17, 2006 1:40 PM

>Comments


Design & Skinning by:
m2 web studios





blog advertising



button1.jpg

Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!