« Ledeen And McCarthy: The Media's War On War | Main | NYT Reveals Secret Briefing On The Painfully Obvious »
The New York Times has come under fire from a wide spectrum of observers for their hysterical and tabloidesque revelation of a national-security program that turns out to break no laws and endanger no one's civil liberties. Today, the Washington Post joins the chorus of criticism, albeit sotto voce, in their lead editorial today:
THE TREASURY Department's just-disclosed program of searching records of overseas bank transfers may provoke outraged comparisons to the National Security Agency's warrantless surveillance and data-mining of telephone call records. At least if news reports and government statements concerning the revelations are correct, however, this program is far less troubling. As with all revelations concerning the secretive Bush administration, you have to worry about what you don't know. So far, however, it seems like exactly the sort of aggressive tactic the government should be taking in the war on terrorism.
For one thing, it appears to be legal. The government is receiving large volumes of data detailing financial transfers from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), a Belgium-based consortium that acts as a kind of messenger service for banks around the world, electronically notifying banks of transactions other banks are attempting to complete. The government, if it develops suspicions about a person, can search the system for any transactions that person may have engaged in. While customer banking data are generally private under federal law, the statute does not appear to cover the society, which isn't a bank and doesn't have individual customers. What's more, a different law gives the president broad powers in a national emergency situation to investigate, or even prohibit, certain financial transactions.
It is also the sort of information the government should be examining in any effort to frustrate terrorist financing and develop leads about who is funding whom.
The Post doesn't come out and explicitly call the NY Times out for hyping a non-story nor say anything at all about the damage done to national security; that may be because their own news editors saw fit to run their own take on the NYT's story yesterday as well. However, it goes a long way to pointing out how little news Lichtblau and Risen reported, and how much hyperbole and bias it comprised instead.
Make no mistake: if this program doesn't violate the law or threaten civil liberties, both of which this editorial stipulates, then it serves no public purpose to report the clandestine efforts involved in pursuing terrorist financing. This editorial rebukes the argument offered by Bill Keller, before he disappeared to a "vacation", that the public interest outweighed national-security concerns.
No one elected Bill Keller to make those kind of decisions for our national security. The White House asked him to spike this story and explained to him why, and he chose to put us all at risk anyway, and as the Post notes, for no purpose other than to sell a few more papers. The Department of Justice needs to find out who leaked this information to Lichtblau and Risen, and at the same time hold Keller and the Times responsible for revealing classified information illegally. Until the Attorney General starts making Keller and his ilk responsible for their attacks on national security, no classified material will remain safe from exposure.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Washington Post Doesn't See The Problem, Either:
Tracked on June 24, 2006 4:05 PM
» N. Korea STILL Threatening Missile Launch! Dumb O from The Dumb Ox
Dictator complains: "Why won't you peeper rie down and ret me wark ovel you rike the Crintons!?" ... weekend news and updates... [Read More]
Tracked on June 24, 2006 5:02 PM
» Our Self-Absorbed Media from Flopping Aces
It’s funny and sad that the same Democratic party which skewered our intelligence agencies for their pre-9/11 intelligence gathering abilities will now stop at anything to crush any attempt to actually fight terrorism. This reporting done by the gang... [Read More]
Tracked on June 24, 2006 9:49 PM
» Quiet Swap: NY Times Changed Late Edition of Swift Bank Story to Appear More Objective from Webloggin
Most of you are aware that the New York Times printed a July 23 Article titled “Bank Data Is Sifted by U.S. in Secret to Block Terror” but I bet you were not aware that they printed an earlier version of the same story on July 22 (late night) title... [Read More]
Tracked on June 24, 2006 10:12 PM
Tracked on June 25, 2006 10:13 AM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!