Many people have written about the controversy over Pope Benedict's recent remarks at the University of Regensburg, where he quoted a medieval emperor about the barbarity of forced religious conversions. In a replay of the Prophet Cartoon madness, Muslims only escalated their rhetoric after the Vatican apologized for any offense the quotation may have given followers of Islam. Despite apologizing Wednesday for quoting Manuel II's words from 1391 (but not for its argument against violence in religion), Muslims burnt effigies of the Roman Catholic leader and staged demonstrations around the world:

Protesters took to the streets in a series of countries with large Muslim populations, including India and Iraq. The ruling party in Turkey likened Pope Benedict XVI to Hitler and Mussolini and accused him of reviving the mentality of the Crusades. In Kashmir, an effigy of the pontiff was burnt.

At Friday prayers in the Iranian capital, Teheran, a leading ayatollah described the Pope as "rude and weak-minded". Pakistan's parliament passed a motion condemning the head of the Roman Catholic Church. Ismail Haniya, the Palestinian prime minister, criticised him hours after a grenade attack on a church in the Gaza Strip. ...

The head of Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Mohammed Mahdi Akef, said the remarks "aroused the anger of the whole Islamic world".

Similar comments were made in other Muslim capitals, raising fears of a repetition of the anger that followed the publication of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed in a Danish newspaper earlier this year.

All this has shown is that Muslims missed the point of the speech, and in fact have endeavored to fulfill Benedict's warnings rather than prove him wrong. If one reads the speech at Regensburg, the entire speech, one understands that the entire point was to reject violence in pursuing religion in any form, be it Islam, Christianity, Judaism, or Bahai. The focal point of the speech was not the recounting of the debate between Manuel II and the unnamed Persian, but rather the rejection of reason and of God that violence brings (emphasis mine):

The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God’s nature. The editor, Theodore Khoury, observes: For the emperor, as a Byzantine shaped by Greek philosophy, this statement is self-evident. But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality. Here Khoury quotes a work of the noted French Islamist R. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazn went so far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Were it God’s will, we would even have to practise idolatry.

This is really the crux of the argument, which is that argument, debate, and rhetoric are absolutely essential in forming any kind of philosophy, including religious doctrine. The words of sacred text do not cover all situations in the world, and therefore development of a solid philosophical body of thought is critical to growth and wisdom. That requires the ability to challenge and to criticize without fear of retribution, a difficulty that most faiths struggle to overcome.

Islam, on the other hand, doesn't bother to try. Benedict never says this explicitly, but Islam's demands that all criticism be silenced turns doctrine into dictatorship, which rejects God on a very basic level. A central tenet of most religions is that humans lack the divine perfection to claim knowledge of the totality of the Divine wisdom. Islam practices a form of supremacy that insists on unquestioned obedience or at least silence of all criticism, especially from outsiders, and creates a violent reaction against it when it occurs.

Islam bullies people into silence, and then obedience. We saw this with the Prophet Cartoons, a series of editorial criticisms that pale into insignificance when seen against similar cartoons from the Muslim media regarding Christians and especially Jews. It is precisely this impulse about which Benedict warns can occur in any religion, but modern Muslims show that they are by far the widest purveyors of this impulse.

Unfortunately, the Muslims are not the only people who missed the point. The New York Times editorial board joins Muslims in demanding an apology and an end to criticism of Islam:

There is more than enough religious anger in the world. So it is particularly disturbing that Pope Benedict XVI has insulted Muslims, quoting a 14th-century description of Islam as “evil and inhuman.” ...

Muslim leaders the world over have demanded apologies and threatened to recall their ambassadors from the Vatican, warning that the pope’s words dangerously reinforce a false and biased view of Islam. For many Muslims, holy war — jihad — is a spiritual struggle, and not a call to violence. And they denounce its perversion by extremists, who use jihad to justify murder and terrorism.

The Vatican issued a statement saying that Benedict meant no offense and in fact desired dialogue.

The Times missed the point, too. They aren't satisfied with the explanation offered by the Vatican. They want a "deep and persuasive apology" for Benedict's temerity in criticizing the use of violence and rejection of reason in religion, and specifically using a six-hundred-year-old quote that insulted people who regularly insult everyone else, including other Muslims. The Times counsels surrender to the threats and the violence.

Benedict opposes both. That's the real threat behind the Pope's speech, and don't think the radical Muslims don't understand it.

UPDATE: Satnley Kurtz at The Corner says that the Gray Lady has insulted Catholics, and demands a "deep and persuasive apology":

In the most provocative part of today's editorial, The New York Times uses the Pope's opposition to Turkey's entry into the European Union as proof that the Pope did in fact mean to offend Muslims, despite his protestations to the contrary. Of course, the conviction that national or regional boundaries ought to take account of significant cultural differences cannot and should not be stigmatized as offensive and bigoted. Yet the Times expanded this already provocative line of argument by implying that traditional Catholics are intolerant, and incapable of interfaith dialogue. The Times also intentionally confused the boundary between deliberate offense and unintentional offense based on carelessness or misunderstanding.

Well, if the Times wants to play these games, so can the rest of us. Be sure to post the nature of how Pinch's editorial board has offended your faith in the past so that we can start a list of apologies owed by the Times.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Pope's Real Threat:

» Pope Benedict XVI Watch: The Papal Islamic Comment FLAP from FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
A masked Palestinian man from the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade attends a rally in Gaza to protest against remarks regarding Islam made by Pope Benedict XVI September 15, 2006. AP: Muslim anger over papal comments grows Pakistan’s legislature unanimou... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 1:40 AM

» Bill's Bites -- 2006.09.16 from Old War Dogs
The webmaster's blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated and bumped, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 2:28 AM

» Muslims Offended by an Inconvenient Truth from rightlinx.com
�Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.� �Pope Benedict, quoting 14th Century Byzantine Emperor, September 12, 2006 [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 3:26 AM

» Islam Hates the Pope from Jo's Cafe
... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 4:34 AM

» Muslims Go Crazy from Liberty and Justice
This tells us all we need to know about the religion of submission, but just for the sake of providing you all with information about what's happening in the world: the New York Times reports that "unknown assailants threw fire bombs on Saturday at two... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 7:09 AM

» The Pope, Islam, and Irony from Pirate's Cove
So, Pope Benedict XVI made some comments about Islam and the violence of its tenents. In Germany last week, the German-born leader of more than one billion Roman Catholics implicitly denounced links between Islam and violence, particularly with referen... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 7:28 AM

» First Cup 09.15.06 from bRight & Early
... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 7:37 AM

» The Pope’s Real Threat — Ed Morrissey, Captain’s Quarters from The Seven Realms
... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 8:21 AM

» Upurassibub Threatens to Kill Pope over Anti-Islam from Planck's Constant
Upurassibub President Abdul Bin Goatfakkir has issued the following threat: "Because the Pope has chosen to call us evil and inhuman, we are extending the threat of death from Infidel dogs to Infidel cats as well. Any Christian cats found praying in ... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 8:43 AM

» Don Your Hijab, MoDo from As the Top of the World Turns
Why shouldn't the Pope defend Catholic identity? Should he be defending Zen Buddhism or the Prosperity Gospel? And who exactly appointed these jamokes as the arbiters of what is proper religious debate? Captain Ed is his usual lucid self on the s... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 9:23 AM

» The Truth In The Pope’s Words from Flopping Aces
So the Pope speaks about rejecting violence in pursuing religion, ALL religions, and the Muslims go batty once more. They went batty over the cartoons, they go batty about pretty much everything these days. But to go batty over the Pope speaking word... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 12:58 PM

» Pope Attack Misses from L'Ombre de l'Olivier
The fact that people are complaining about the pope "attacking Islam" shows that people can't actually read or listen to what the pope actually said as I shall explain below. On the other hand there is a certain amount of irony with every Imam and hi... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 2:31 PM

» The Pope�s Words from Don Singleton
It is accurate to say that for many Muslims jihad is a spiritual struggle, within one's self, to do what God wishes. And we have absolutely no problem with those Muslims; we just more of them would speak out against the Islamofascists that have perve... [Read More]

Tracked on September 16, 2006 3:30 PM

» Round Up - Islamic (in)Tolerence Post from Jo's Cafe
... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2006 5:03 AM

» Round Up - Islamic (in)Tolerence Post from Jo's Cafe
... [Read More]

Tracked on September 17, 2006 5:03 AM

» Mondays, ohhhh Mondays from Obi's Sister
As expected, the Muslim swarm completely missed the point of the Pope’s words last Tuesday in Germany. Typical. The Anchoress quotes Ed Morrissey’s excellent post: [emphasis mine] All this has shown is that Muslims missed the point of the... [Read More]

Tracked on September 18, 2006 11:58 AM