The new National Intelligence Estimate will report that the Iraq War has amplified Islamist movements and created a new generation of jihadists, according to the New York Times, which saw an advance copy of the summary and spoke to several sources involved in its creation. (The Washington Post also reports on it here.) Mark Mazetti explains how the various intelligence agencies have concluded that our efforts to topple Saddam have inspired even more radicalism, but strangely absent from this report is how Islamist expansion managed to exponentially grow in the twelve years that we attempted to resolve the Iraq quagmire peacefully:

A stark assessment of terrorism trends by American intelligence agencies has found that the American invasion and occupation of Iraq has helped spawn a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks.

The classified National Intelligence Estimate attributes a more direct role to the Iraq war in fueling radicalism than that presented either in recent White House documents or in a report released Wednesday by the House Intelligence Committee, according to several officials in Washington involved in preparing the assessment or who have read the final document.

The intelligence estimate, completed in April, is the first formal appraisal of global terrorism by United States intelligence agencies since the Iraq war began, and represents a consensus view of the 16 disparate spy services inside government. Titled “Trends in Global Terrorism: Implications for the United States,’’ it asserts that Islamic radicalism, rather than being in retreat, has metastasized and spread across the globe.

An opening section of the report, “Indicators of the Spread of the Global Jihadist Movement,” cites the Iraq war as a reason for the diffusion of jihad ideology.

The report “says that the Iraq war has made the overall terrorism problem worse,” said one American intelligence official.

It's a fascinating article, and one CQ readers should read in its entirety. It makes the classic logical fallacy of confusing correlation with causation, and the basic premise can easily be dismissed with a reminder of some basic facts.

First and foremost, Islamist radicalism didn't just start expanding in 2003. The most massive expansion of Islamist radicalism came after the end of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, when the Islamists defeated one of the world's superpowers. Shortly afterwards, the staging of American forces in Saudi Arabia to drive Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait created the most significant impulse for the expansion of organized Islamist radicalism and led directly to the formation of al-Qaeda. It put the US in Wahhabi jihadist crosshairs for the first time.

So should we have allowed Saddam to invest Kuwait rather than risk amplifying the Islamist impulse? Some might argue for that in hindsight, but it would have put all of our allies and trading partners at risk in the region, as Saddam would not likely have stopped with his "19th Province". It does mean that we should have gone all the way to Baghdad then and there, removing Saddam and doing what we're doing now twelve years earlier. We could have worked with a less-radicalized Shi'ite majority and an Iraqi population more inclined to trust American resolve -- and we would have left Saudi Arabia years before 2003.

Unfortunately, we decided to allow Saddam to survive, and then got caught up in a 12-year war that only occasionally looked like peace. We had to keep tens of thousands of forces staged in Saudi Arabia, the action that prompted al-Qaeda's formation and mission in the first place, for a dozen years while we allowed Saddam to continually defy both the cease-fire agreement and sixteen UN Security Council resolutions. Either we had to acknowledge defeat in that war and retreat from the region after 9/11, or we had to end that twelve-year war in order to prosecute the war on terror in the region where terrorists lived.

Did that make Islamists more angry? Yes, I'm sure it did, and it probably did give them a great propaganda tool for recruitment. However, here's the crux of the problem: no matter what we do to fight the Islamists and to establish liberal thinking in opposition to them, they're going to get motivated because of it. Even an abject surrender and a return to isolationism will not work, because their victory over us will be an even greater motivational force for Islamist expansion.

We had to conclude the Iraq war in order to fight radical Islamist terrorists. We could not afford to allow Saddam to escape the noose -- which our erstwhile allies on the Security Council tried through the corruption of the Oil-For-Food program -- and to have his miltary on our flank in the region. When the planes flew into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11, that truth finally dawned on Washington DC -- that the long quagmire in Iraq had seriously endangered the US in the region and beyond, and that we had to end the one war as a part of the new war that terrorist had thrust upon us.

To put it bluntly, fighting terrorists and upsetting their plans for regional domination will make them mad. Creating opportunities for liberalizing democratic structures to thrive in their back yard will give them enough resentment among Islamists to recruit more terrorists. If we don't already know that much, then we haven't paid much attention. When George Bush warned us that this would be a long war, this is exactly what he meant. The only way to win this war is to give the people in the region better options than Islamic totalitarianism, and a success in Iraq will go a long way towards that goal.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NIE: Ending 12-Year Iraqi Quagmire Made Terrorism Worse:

» So What Do We Do, Then? from Blue Crab Boulevard
There are multiple reports in the major media about a leaked National Intelligence Estimate. All are based off anonymous sources, talking about the document. The document itself is not available, nor it is possible to judge the motivations of... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 11:01 AM

» Bill's Bites -- 2006.09.24 from Old War Dogs
The webmaster's blog-within-a-blog. Continuously updated, newest items at the top. Please click here to learn more about The Phoenix Project, then click here to see a selection of Old War Dogs merchandise. All sales proceeds go to support The Phoenix [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 11:25 AM

» The Hornet's Nest from A Blog For All
We're assuming that the intel agencies were accurately tracking the threats posed by international terrorism, particularly Islamic terrorism, all this time. We clearly did not believe that the threats posed by Islamic terrorists and the firebrand mul... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 11:35 AM

» WaPo: Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Hurting U.S. Terror Fight from The Unalienable Right
The Washington Post reports on a new National Intelligence Estimate (which apparently comes as a result of yet another leak of classified material from the intelligence commmunity), that offers a grim assessment of the state of the war on terror today ... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 12:45 PM

» NIE… No Big Surprise. from Thinking Right
The NYT has an interesting article on the new NIE or National Intelligence Estimate. Long story short; Iraq has ticked off Islamofacists, and they’re using the war as a recruiting tool. What the article and the NIE fail to recognize is that there... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 3:17 PM

» Does Appeasing Terrorism Destroy One's Soul? from GINA COBB
Rick Moran at Right Wing Nut House asks: Does Confronting Terrorism Make It Worse? It's an interesting and thoughtful read. In it, Moran response to a National Intelligence Estimate report claiming that the Iraq war has increased the Islamist threat. C... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 4:35 PM

» Democrat Talking Points from HILLARYNEEDSAVACATION
The Democrat Election Strategy on full display. The pattern is familar. Once again, the NY Times begins slanting a leak of a probable classified report, in an attempt to sway public opinion. Isn't it ironic, the implication mimics the current express... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 6:38 PM

» Are We To Blame For All The Terrorists? from Right Voices
The NYT’s and WaPo are both running stories today about an National Intelligence Estimate report due out shortly. The crux of the articles points to our Iraq War is the cause of the escalation of radical Islamic extremists..We are fighting in I... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 8:28 PM

» New York Times On NIE Report from Conservative Compendium
The New York Times is gleefully reporting on a yet to be release National Intelligence Estimate supposedly attributing the Iraq war to rising global jihad. A stark assessment of terrorism trends... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 8:39 PM

» New York Times On NIE Report from Conservative Compendium
The New York Times is gleefully reporting on a yet to be release National Intelligence Estimate supposedly attributing the Iraq war to rising global jihad. A stark assessment of terrorism trends... [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 8:40 PM

» Is Democracy the answer to terrorism? Maybe not. from Right Truth
True democracy is about more than elections, as Daniel Pipes says. Take the situation in Palestine with Hamas for one, Lebanon and Hezbollah for another, and the Kifaya movement in Egypt which is pushing to end the country's peace treaty [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 10:16 PM

» Is Democracy the answer to terrorism? Maybe not. from Right Truth
True democracy is about more than elections, as Daniel Pipes says. Take the situation in Palestine with Hamas for one, Lebanon and Hezbollah for another, and the Kifaya movement in Egypt which is pushing to end the country's peace treaty [Read More]

Tracked on September 24, 2006 10:29 PM

» Global War on Terror Watch: National Intelligence Estimate from FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
Supporters of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein take to the streets during a demonstration in Tikrit, 175 km (110 miles) north of Baghdad, September 22, 2006. A newspaper report that a U.S. intelligence analysis said the Iraq war gave rise to a ne... [Read More]

Tracked on September 25, 2006 6:49 AM

» Cherry-Filled NIE on Terrorism (Update) from GroupIntel
Wow, the (still classified) NIE on terrorism reportedly points out that the war in Iraq has sown a new crop of Jihadists and ratcheted up the terrorist threat since 9/11/01. The intelligence estimate, completed in April, is the first formal appraisal o... [Read More]

Tracked on September 25, 2006 7:18 AM

» Shooting the Messenger: Contra William from Southern Appeal
William, not to jump overly ugly with a co-blogger here, but your conclusion that “It was a mistake to invade Iraq–Bush ignored warnings and now has simply made the terrorism problem worse” is bunk. Was it “Dubya’s” inva... [Read More]

Tracked on September 25, 2006 10:20 AM

» A Series of "Fortunate" Events. from Publius Hamilton
I have the feeling that Karl Rove is playing Rope-a-Dope with the NY Slimes and the Washington Putz newspapers and the Democ-rats. Rove probably knew the leftist sympathizers in the intel community (or the Democrat members of the Intelligence Committees) [Read More]

Tracked on September 26, 2006 2:49 PM

» Too many secrets? from Leaning Straight Up
The recent leak of the NIE report on terrorism was immediately hailed as a fatal blow to Bush’s policies regarding Iraq and terrorism. The report seemed to suggest that all the efforts to the contrary have made terrorism worse.   I... [Read More]

Tracked on September 26, 2006 2:58 PM

» Too many secrets? from Leaning Straight Up
The recent leak of the NIE report on terrorism was immediately hailed as a fatal blow to Bush’s policies regarding Iraq and terrorism. The report seemed to suggest that all the efforts to the contrary have made terrorism worse.   I... [Read More]

Tracked on September 26, 2006 6:32 PM