Captain's Quarters Blog


« GOP Straw Poll (Updated) | Main | British Revamp Defamation Laws To Protect Free Speech »

October 11, 2006
Harry Reid And The Culture Of Corruption

Once again, we discover why the Democrats quietly dropped their "culture of corruption" theme for the upcoming midterms. The AP catches Harry Reid without a disclosure on real-estate deals that netted him $700,000 in profit:

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show.

In the process, Reid did not disclose to Congress an earlier sale in which he transferred his land to a company created by a friend and took a financial stake in that company, according to records and interviews.

The Nevada Democrat's deal was engineered by Jay Brown, a longtime friend and former casino lawyer whose name surfaced in a major political bribery trial this summer and in other prior organized crime investigations. He's never been charged with wrongdoing - except for a 1981 federal securities complaint that was settled out of court. ...

The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential property on Las Vegas' booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown. One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported. The seller never talked to Reid.

In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown. The senator didn't disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown's company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land.

After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown's company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator's investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale.

In fact, this isn't a new development for Harry Reid. Less than two months ago, I wrote about Reid's questionable involvement and compensation in a related real-estate deal outside of Las Vegas, and the post turned into a column for the New York Post. Harvey Whittemore, a lobbyist and real-estate investor, plied Reid with campaign contributions and employed Reid's family members -- and in exchange, Reid did a number of favors that allowed Whittemore to realize large profits at the expense of environmental regulations that Reid helped Whittemore bulldoze. I wrote at the time:


The story of Coyote Springs sounds like a Horatio Alger story. The land Whittemore bought in 1998 from a defense contractor who intended on using it for target practice had a number of restrictions on its use. A quarter of it was subject to a federal power-line right of way. Another quarter had federal protection for the desert tortoise, an endangered species that also is Nevada's official state reptile. The land had a fragile series of streams and washes that required special permission on which to build without ruining the desert's ecosystem.

None of these obstacles proved too difficult for Whittemore, at least not while he had his friend Harry Reid running interference in Congress. Interior refused to relocate the tortoises for over five years, until the Bureau of Land Management agreed to swap the land for another parcel abutting a federal preserve elsewhere. No one ever did an analysis to determine whether the deal was fair to either party, nor did the BLM go to Congress for approval on the changes to a project that Congress had explicitly legislated.

In 2002, Reid worked on the power corridor. He inserted obscure provisions into a land management bill that relocated the power corridor, freeing Whittemore to build on the 10,500 acres that Congress had previously held -- which means that someone else now had to lose property value for Whittemore's benefit, and for no cost whatsoever. That bald move caused raised eyebrows at the BLM and the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and Reid backed away -- for the moment. Less than two years later, Reid tried again to give Whittemore the land for a song ($160,000), but Congress balked again. He finally settled for freeing the land for development and allowing Whittemore to buy it at a fair market rate, and forcing the government to relocate the power corridor.

In 2005, Reid and fellow Nevada Senator John Ensign conducted a series of interventions with the EPA to eliminate the final obstacle -- the environmental impact on the fragile ecosystem in Coyote Springs Valley. When the agency blocked Whittemore's efforts, Reid and Ensign held several meetings with EPA officials to pressure them into submission. Whittemore used another Reid son, Lief, to lobby his father's office for assistance. In the end, the pressure paid off, as the EPA backed down from its opposition after winning a few concessions on the development plan.

What did Reid get in exchange for all of this support? According to the Times, Whittemore contributed $45,000 to Reid and his PACs since 2000. He also gave the DSCC $20,000 in 2000, when it pushed Reid as a leader for the party in the Senate. Reid's son Josh got $5,000 for his unsuccessful campaign for a city council seat; his other sone Rory got $5,000 for his successful effort to win a spot on the Clark County Board of Commissioners.

This appears to be of a piece with the Whittemore connection. In fact, it seems as though Whittemore's project was part of the transactions the AP discovered. "One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported" -- that's the same project as Coyote Springs. A major portion of that story had to do with Reid trying to grease the skids for the land swap so that Whittemore could get around the federal right-of-way.

Hilariously, this appears just days after James Webb tried smearing George Allen with a pseudoscandal over stock options that Allen disclosed and never exercised, meaning that he never cleared a dime from the options. Now we have the Democratic caucus leader dodging disclosures and failing to disclose $800,000 in profits from a project on which he partnered with a lawyer suspected of connections to organized crime and a bribery scandal. And let's not forget Reid's connections to Jack Abramoff, whom Democrats tried mightily to use as a poster boy for Republican-only graft:

The activities _ detailed in billing records and correspondence obtained by The Associated Press _ are far more extensive than previously disclosed. They occurred over three years as Reid collected nearly $68,000 in donations from Abramoff's firm, lobbying partners and clients. ...

Abramoff's records show his lobbying partners billed for nearly two dozen phone contacts or meetings with Reid's office in 2001 alone.

Most were to discuss Democratic legislation that would have applied the U.S. minimum wage to the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory and Abramoff client, but would have given the islands a temporary break on the wage rate, the billing records show.

Reid also intervened on government matters at least five times in ways helpful to Abramoff's tribal clients, once opposing legislation on the Senate floor and four times sending letters pressing the Bush administration on tribal issues. Reid collected donations around the time of each action.

Reid also had a former staffer go to work for Abramoff, who then held campaign fundraisers in Abramoff's offices.

No wonder Reid hung up on the AP reporter when they asked him to comment on this story. Reid has demonstrated that he has few scruples when it comes to using his position and power for his personal enrichment and that of his family and "associates". If the Democrats continue to have Reid as the leader of their Senate caucus, voters should realize the kind of leadership he will provide if the Democrats win control of the Senate.

UPDATE: This story provides an answer to a question I had regarding Reid's dealings with Whittemore. The earlier story showed that Whittemore benefited Reid's kids and his election campaigns, but Reid worked awfully hard for Whittemore's benefit for no direct personal payoff. This land-swap deal and the $700,000 profit shows that Reid had a direct financial interest for his earlier interventions on Whittemore's behalf.

Sphere It Digg! View blog reactions
Posted by Ed Morrissey at October 11, 2006 6:41 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry is

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Harry Reid And The Culture Of Corruption:

» Bill's Bites -- 2006.10.11 from Old War Dogs
The webmaster's blog-within-a-blog.Continuously updated, newest items at the top. The Blog Of War, Blackfive's new Best From the MilBlogs book,is now available for free download to enlisted military personnel. 20:22Bush: U.S. 'Reserves All Options' To ... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 8:29 PM

» Hung Up on Ethics from A Blog For All
What a surprise. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) hung up on the AP when questions got a little too close for comfort about his ethical dealings on a land deal that netted a sweetheart $1.1 million deal. [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 8:49 PM

» Harry Reid should resign! from Mark Levin Fan
Wednesday, Mark discussed the Las Vegas land sale scandal involving Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid and called on him to resign. Oh yes! We want Harry Reid’s email and instant messages! ... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 10:38 PM

» Is Harry Dirty? from :: Political Musings ::
I question the timing of this AP story: WASHINGTON - Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. I'm no... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 10:49 PM

» Most corrupt Congress in history! from thinkinboutstuff
Remember this: Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid called the Republican-led Congress “the most corrupt in history” Guess he would know:  Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even t... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 10:55 PM

» The latest "Dirty" Harry Reid scandal from Lonewacko
The AP says: Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. In the... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 10:57 PM

» The latest "Dirty" Harry Reid scandal from Lonewacko
The AP says: Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. In the... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 10:59 PM

» The latest "Dirty" Harry Reid scandal from Lonewacko
The AP says: Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn't personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. In the... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 11:03 PM

» The latest "Dirty" Harry Reid scandal from Illegal_immigration_news
Yet more reasons why Harry Reid should resign. [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 11:06 PM

» Harry Reid's Corrupt Connections from Stuck On Stupid
 !!!Update:10/11/2006!!!(This post will continue to be bumped to the top with every Harry Reid corruption story.) Harry hangs up on AP when asked about his latest questionable money acquisition.Which party seems to be the most corrupt in hist... [Read More]

Tracked on October 11, 2006 11:21 PM

» A not-so-sexy scandal from Polimom Says
Hmmm….. From the AP (via Brietbart): Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn’t personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. In the process, R... [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 6:03 AM

» Harry Reid in trouble? from The Real Ugly American.com
Captain Ed has the best coverage of this story. Once again, we discover why the Democrats quietly dropped their “culture of corruption” theme for the upcoming midterms. The AP catches Harry Reid without a disclosure on real-estate deals tha... [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 8:06 AM

» Dirty Harry's Dirty Dealings from The Political Pit Bull
Captain Ed has the details here.... [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 8:53 AM

» Yeah, but will he give back the $68,000 now? from Macsmind - Conservative Commentary and Common Sense
Harry Reid’s house of cards is coming down. “Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn’t personally owned the property for three years, property deeds show. In t... [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 9:28 AM

» Dirty Harry from Texas Rainmaker
That ol’ corruption glass house comes shattering down on Harry Reid… again. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid collected a $1.1 million windfall on a Las Vegas land sale even though he hadn’t personally owned the property for three y... [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 11:46 AM

» Figli e figliastri from The Right Nation
L'ennesimo episodio di corruzione coinvolge un membro del Congresso statunitense alla vigilia delle elezioni di mid-term. Questa volta, per, non aspettatevi che i mainstream media muovano un dito: il deputato democratico. [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 2:13 PM

» That culture of corruption thing from Hoystory
Despite the continuing low-level rumble of the Mark Foley scandal, the Democrats seem to have largely abandoned their “culture of corruption” talking points. Why? Two reasons. First, there still isn’t $90,000 in my freezer. Second, Se... [Read More]

Tracked on October 12, 2006 3:23 PM

>Comments


Design & Skinning by:
m2 web studios





blog advertising



button1.jpg

Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!