« Are The House Democrats Revolting? | Main | The Return Of The Blue Dogs »
The EU wants to start charging airline passengers for the pollution caused by their transportation. The draft legislation would affect all carriers coming in and out of Europe, effectively taxing American airlines without any opportunity to debate the fees:
AIRLINE passengers would pay up to £27 extra for a return ticket to cover the environmental damage caused by their flights, under European Commission proposals to address climate change.
Draft legislation to be published next month would require all flights arriving or departing from European Union airports to buy permits to cover their carbon dioxide emissions. ....
This will infuriate the United States and many other countries because it would affect all flights into and out of Europe, regardless of their origin or destination. US airlines would have to buy permits to cover their emissions on their European routes.
The Association of European Airlines (AEA) said that the proposal could provoke a trade war between the US and the EU, and raise the risk of flight restrictions and sanctions on European goods.
The commission previously appeared to favour a scheme that covered flights only starting and ending within the EU. But the document concludes that an intra-EU scheme would be far less effective, reducing CO2 emissions by 44 million tonnes compared with 183 million tonnes if all arriving and departing flights were included.
The election of the Democrats to Congress has generated many predictions of an end to free trade. Apparently the EU wants to start early on this process. The imposition of a tax on transcontinental flights by the EU will almost certainly prompt new fees on European carriers wanting to land in the US. In fact, the Department of Homeland Security has had a number of conflicts with the EU on airline security arrangements, and the US might decide to ban carriers who don't fully comply with American demands in the future.
The EU claims that the tax will lower the amount of emissions from the airline industry by forcing them to buy new planes. However, the EU subsidizes its airlines and Airbus, its airplane manufacturer. That allows European companies to have newer fleets, which reduces their emissions and would allow them to get less expensive permits. All airlines would have to start a new accounting regimen for their emissions, subject to EU oversight, which points to even more taxes and fees down the road.
This is an obvious protectionist racket. Charging the fees would not force carriers to upgrade their planes; in fact, it would take money out of their hands that might otherwise be used for that purpose. In the competitive US market, an extra $40 or so might price a few customers out of the European trips, but the bigger impact will be the accounting cost for the new reporting. The EU wants American carriers to lose any competitive edge. It's basically the opening salvos of a trade war.
Free trade may be a quicker casualty of the new political paradigm than first imagined. Don't expect this to end with the airlines. Agricultural tariffs will expand next, and after that, the field's wide open.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference EU To Put Green Tax On Intercontinental Flights:
» EU Airlines Green Tax Watch: £27 Green Tax on Long flights from FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog
TimesOnLine: American fury at plan to charge £27 green tax on long flights AIRLINE passengers would pay up to £27 extra for a return ticket to cover the environmental damage caused by their flights, under European Commission proposals to address cli... [Read More]
Tracked on November 16, 2006 8:10 AM
» What Rights? Ask The Nanny State! from Fly At Night
The fist pumper was overjoyed because the government gained another foothold in control over the people’s lives. That is what this is all about – Government Control. If it was about health the substance would be banned, not taxed. A total ban did ... [Read More]
Tracked on November 16, 2006 10:44 AM
» The wages of anti-colonialism is still death, and the latest round of the trade wars may be heating up. from Pros and Cons
Loving life seems incompatible with hating colonialism. That seemed true even when Italians and Serbs drove out their Germanic and Hungaric administrators in the risorgimento. That is clearly true in the Sudan, where that genocidal government has a ... [Read More]
Tracked on November 17, 2006 10:13 AM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!