About
Captain Ed is a father and grandfather living in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota, a native Californian who moved to the North Star State because of the weather. He lives with his wife Marcia, also known as the First Mate, their two dogs, and frequently watch their granddaughter Kayla, whom Captain Ed calls The Little Admiral.
Read More
The Crows Nest
Rule 1: Drag The Corpse On Over First
If I've learned anything in four years of blogging, don't try to be out in front of the death rumors, especially with the villains of the world. Saddam died a hundred deaths before we caught him alive in his spider hole, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi almost as many before his demise last year. Osama may or may not be alive, but everyone's avoided speculating on his fate for a while now. Maybe Val at Babalu Blog will get luckier with his "Castro Is Dead" story. We all hope so. I'll wait for the announcement ....
Hobbs Choice
Volunteer Voters is holding its annual "Best of Nashville" on-line polls, and one of the categories is for the best political writer. Our friend Bill Hobbs, now posting at Newsbusters, and he'd like his on-line fans to cast their votes. Drop by and put one in for Bill if you get a chance!
Murtha Getting Backlogged On Apologies
Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring sees another case collapsing on the Haditha charges. He's called for Murtha to apologize earlier, and adds another reason to the tally.
No Such Thing As 'Moderate' Islam?
Turkish PM Tayyip Erdogan told a television interviewer that he finds the label "moderate Islam" offensive. Shrink Wrapped has a lot more on this, but at least in the same interview Erdogan acknowledged that "radical Islam" exists, and that it's been a catastrophe. Be sure to read the whole post.
MS-NBC Gets Punk'd
Power Line has a great post on a lack of journalistic effort on the part of MS-NBC. In covering the Michael Vick story, they reported on what they thought was Al Sharpton's website proclaiming Vick's innocence. I guess Alex Johnson and two other MS-NBC reporters couldn't bother to read the title bar of the site, which proudly proclaims it as a "parody site".
New Instapundit Podcast On Pharmaceuticals
I just caught this e-mail from Glenn Reynolds about his new podcast with Richard Epstein, the author of Overdose: How Excessive Government Regulation Stifles Pharmaceutical Innovation. Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but the topic is important enough to make sure I carve out time for it tomorrow. Get their first and tell me what I'm missing ....
Fed Trying A 'Stealth Easing'?
The Federal Reserve seems to have conducted a quiet campaign to steady markets that started spinning out of control, according to King Banaian at SCSU Scholars. He thinks that the Fed has conducted a "stealth easing". Be sure to read his explanation and follow his lnks.
A Shameless Bit Of Sel-Promotion
Gateway Pundit and Val at Babalu Blog note a crass PR move by Hugo Chavez. Venezuela has responded to Peru's eathquake disaster with food shipments -- and with Hugo's smiling picture on the cans. He also uses the tuna-can label to undermine President Garcia of Peru, who narrowly defeated Chavez' pal Ollanto Humalla, whom the labels extol for his "solidarity" with Chavez.
Tacky beyond belief.
Bush Going After Palestinian Terror Financing?
George Bush's new orders to USAID forces them to review the executive management of all NGOs to ensure that they have no terrorist connections. Carl in Jerusalem says at Israel Matzav that the order specifically intends to target Palestinian front groups for terrorists. Let's hope he's right.
Slow Start!
Yes, I'm off to a slow start today, thanks to some scripting issues, a bad back, and an alarm clock that needs replacing. Bear with me -- I'm ramping up, I promise...
And Now, In Little League Action Last Night ...
I once played in a Little League game where we lost, 30-1, obviously before mercy rules came into being. The only comfort during that shellacking was that 13-year-olds don't have to justify their salaries for being on the field. You have to wonder what the Baltimore Orioles have to feel without that caveat today, after losing 30-3 to the Texas Rangers. Sixteen of the runs came in the last two innings .... (via TMV)
Bush Speech On Iraq
I got a couple of e-mails wondering why I haven't linked to George Bush's speech today. I liked it; I just didn't have much to add. Rush Limbaugh covered it well on his site, and Power Line also links approvingly but has nothing much more to say. Michael Goldfarb notes that the Weekly Standard had made a similar argument regarding Vietnam a year ago.
Rove Fears Me -- No, Really!
Hot Air notes the latest fundraising letter from John Edwards. No longer content to indulge his paranoia when Ann Coulter mentions him, now he wants to indulge it when Karl Rove doesn't. Has any candidate seemed this desperate before now?
Racism Or Hard Truth?
Angela Winters looks at an editorial cartoon and the controvery it has caused in Jacksonville, Florida, especially in the black community. Truth or racism? When rap artists tell young listeners not to cooperate with the police, how much responsibility do they have for the victimization that follows? Read all of the essay at The Moderate Voice.
Support Citizen Journalism
Bill Ardolino at INDC Journal reminds us that there is a reporter shortage on the front lines. The best way to solve that problem? Donate to Public Multimedia, the citizen-journalist organization that supports Bill Roggio, Bill Ardolino, and others. (And a direct donation to Michael Yon would be much appreciated as well.)
Comments (5)
Posted by Brad | May 7, 2007 10:51 AM
Congress has purview and authority over federal elections. A primary is not an election in any sense of it. The election for president doesn't happen until November 2008. Winning a party nomination has nothing to do with federal office whatsoever, period.
A primary is a PARTY affair, wherein they decide who THEY want to send to RUN for office in that federal election. Congress doesn't have any ability to do anything about that, nor should they. It's an internal party selection process. The party is the one that decides to have primaries (they don't have to, by the way), they're the ones that decide how to do it, they're the ones that agree to abide by the results (they don't have to, by the way). They can nominate a wet paper bag if they like.
I agree with your point about the process having gotten mucked up, but it's an issue of the party, and needs to be taken up with them. Congress has nothing to do with it.
Conservatism 101: Just because something is not working optimally doesn't mean it's time for the government to swoop in and fix it.
Posted by Lew | May 7, 2007 11:52 AM
Brad,
I would agree with the sentiment expressed in your concluding dictum above, but the fact is that the primaries exist at the behest of the governments of each State, not the political parties. So if Congress wants to diddle with the States' ability to establish and schedule primary elections, then the legal trapdoor is wide open for them to do exactly that. And don't forget that your average CongressCritter consider's themselves all-purpose problem solvers of unlimited scope and wisdom. And we keep electing them because they do, NOT in spite of it!
Good Luck!
Posted by krm | May 7, 2007 12:35 PM
What is to prevent the leapfrogging?
How about the political party rules. As I understand it, any state that moves its primary to a date before Feb. 5 loses some of its delegates to the convention. If the state wishes to lose its delegates (turning the primary into a non-binding beauty contest and diminishing the state's role in the nomination process), that should be OK with the people in other states.
Posted by Carol_Herman | May 7, 2007 12:43 PM
In life, expect change. It's not just what happens to your hair, either.
But in politics, while some things are older than the hills. Including, since 1840, really dirty political games tossed at oponents. You also see that the lapel buttons, came. And, went.
So, why not see changes in the structure of the primaries?
We've got the Internet. News seems to fly faster since people no longer use the pundits to analyze days old news for them. The whole thing with "bursting headlines" seems to be fizzling. (Okay. Not for the tabloids. Paris Hilton still had her days "above the fold.")
But for the "juice" of the primaries to work, you'd have to see things remaining the same. When this just isn't true, anymore.
Of course, this is gonna make a difference on the right. (I'm not interested in the left.)
When Reagan ran in 1980, he was running against an unpopular president. And, still? The odd's makers thought he was "too old." And, they'd gain ground by painting him a "John Bircher."
Yup. Even on the right, things changed. And, instead of a small, exceedingly rich, group of men; who bought their position at the GOP table; they are gone, now.
How did the John Bircher's get kicked out? Well, sometimes, men just die off like flies. And, when you look back to 1980. And, you expect to see them standing there. All you get are grave stones.
While the right, itself, changed.
Reagan saw Blue Collar Democrats, galore! It's as if every union member, no matter what the union bosses paid to the donks; saw that in the voting booths, these people turned towards Reagan.
Fiscal conservatives? Yup.
Libertarians? Yup.
In other words BOTH PARTIES are now really minority parties. With most people NOT participating. When you ask the average "man in the street" for his party label? Lots of folks just say "they're independent."
And, what can we see in 2008? Seems France just taught a MAJOR lesson! And, let me point out that Sarkozy is a JEW. And, he won with a 6 point spread. That kind of win? It's a blow out. Royal was so far behind him, that the MANDATE also goes to the JEW. Neat.
Nah. Can't quite happen here.
But politicians are keenly aware of blow out elections. They talk about that, the way they talk about Secretariat. Memories of our best elections always come to the fore.
The Bush's? They ran to the top the old-fashioned way. So, there could be lots of stories you haven't quite grabbed onto, yet? WW1 was also like that. Run by the "old timers." Using the "subjects" like peasants to toss onto the funeral pyres. Books didn't come down until at least a decade later. And, if it wasn't for WW2, and it's blow-out results, we still be discussing what went wrong in the war that came "before."
As to Iraq? I don't see us at war. And, I don't see us tackling the terror issues, either. France, however, has just stepped up to the plate! Their big issue? IMMIGRATION. Put the stop to that. Get the muggers and criminals off the street. And, make them work.
How will Sarkozy deal with this one? Among what he wants to do: Take the taxes off of overtime pay. Reduce the inheritance taxes, which are now overwhelming. And, FORCE someone to take a job! In other words, when you're on unemployment; your time to get the checks will be measured. Since? The government can hand you a job, instead. REFUSE TO DO IT? No more unemployment checks. What's the spread? Currently, France has 8.5 unemployment. And, Sarkozy wants it reduced to 5%.
How he's gonna tackle the muzzies, however, I do not know.
But if you want another lesson? For a blow out with a 6% lead, Sarkozy got lots of WOMEN to vote for the JEW! No wonder Royal thought she'd win. And, she lost, instead.
I love upsets like that.
Posted by Del Dolemonte | May 7, 2007 8:15 PM
krm said:
"What is to prevent the leapfrogging?
How about the political party rules. As I understand it, any state that moves its primary to a date before Feb. 5 loses some of its delegates to the convention. If the state wishes to lose its delegates (turning the primary into a non-binding beauty contest and diminishing the state's role in the nomination process), that should be OK with the people in other states."
Here in New Hampshire, us illiterate cow-farmers put a brilliant line into our law for the NH Primary-we didn't give it an exact date, only specified that it would be "before" any other primary.
The ones trying to change that are (gasp) the Democrats. I'm shocked! Shocked, I say.