June 15, 2007

CQ On CBS In Today's New York Post

On Wednesday, I wrote about comments made by Les Moonves to explain the failure thus far of their new anchor, Katie Couric, to attract viewers. Did he blame himself for hiring Couric? No. Did he blame CBS for producing a lousy news broadcast that sent viewers scrambling for their remotes? No. He blamed the viewers for their sexist attitudes.

Today, the New York Post prints my column blasting Moonves for ducking responsibility for the low ratings and shifting blame to the CBS audience:

"I'm sort of surprised by the vitriol against her. The number of people who don't want news from a woman was startling," Moonves told his audience.

Got that, America? It's not Katie's fault, and it's not that CBS stinks at putting together a compelling news show. It's that you're all a bunch of misogynistic bigots.

CBS has a problem, all right - but it isn't audience chauvinism, it's management cluelessness.

I've watched the show a few times, shortly after the switch, mostly out of curiosity. Couric isn't awful, but she's not very good either. The big problem with the show was the lack of news, or at least it was at the time. CBS dumbed the show down, apparently hoping that would attract Couric's former audience -- but just because people want to start their day out with lighter fare like "Today" doesn't mean they want the same from their evening news.

Had CBS just retooled the show and kept their collective mouths shut, Couric may have found an audience. One or two blockbuster interviews could have turned the ratings around; look at what the Hugh Grant interview did for Jay Leno, after he finally fired his out-of-control manager and found his footing on the Tonight Show. Jay, however, didn't go out on the circuit and blame his initial poor performance against David Letterman on some supposed anti-Italian bigotry of NBC's late-night audience. He and NBC fixed the problems, and the audience rediscovered him.

It may be too late now for Couric and Moonves to do that. They have created a lot of antagonism in the people they supposedly want to attract. Viacom may want to send Moonves to a public-relations skills course or two in the immediate future.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (5)

Posted by stackja1945 [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 15, 2007 7:12 AM

"dumbed the show down" dumbed down the audience.

Posted by Lew | June 15, 2007 7:49 AM

You just can't beat these folks for brain-dead elitism. They will continue to insist that they know better and that the world simply lacks their refined sensibilities in these matters, until the day they go broke.

Earth to Les Moonves: "Stop trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole!" Katy Couric is just fine in the right venue, but the evening news ain't it!

If Les can't figure out how to intelligently and effectively deploy the talent he has at his disposal, then CBS needs to find someone who will.

Posted by GarandFan | June 15, 2007 10:50 AM

Moonves and Pinch are perfect examples of the Peter Principle. Throwing in the NY Elite MSM attitude is just icing on the cake.

Posted by rrk | June 15, 2007 11:08 AM

All this seems a distraction from the main event here.

The network "evening news" with Walter and Chet and David, and Dan, for that matter, is deader than a coffin nail.

The whole idea of "the world in thirty minutes" (or similar such mewling) is bogus.

In fact, I'm inclined to cast a wider net here to say that the whole "news center-nerve center" thing is bogus. There are those outside its cultural reach for whom this is patently obvious and who use it on us constantly.

Posted by commander0 [TypeKey Profile Page] | June 15, 2007 9:34 PM

I heard this and I heard Rather and all I could think was that there is no serious student of world events who relies on a big 3 evening news for information. At all. Other sources are better, faster, more reliable, deeper and devoid of chaff. What place do they have left except as the evening Today show for casual observers? And Dan, you had more than a small role in making it so.