June 25, 2007

CQ Radio: Talk Radio Economics

blog radio

Today on CQ Radio (2 pm CT), I'll be talking with my friend and former talk-radio partner King Banaian of SCSU Scholars. We'll review the economic arguments in the Center for American Progress report on talk radio, and since King is chair of economics at St. Cloud State University, he'll bring more light than heat on that topic. We'll also talk about our friendly debate on whether journalists should be barred by their employers from participating in politics, one of the subjects of Howard Kurtz' column today.

Call 646-652-4889 to join the conversation!

UPDATE: Thanks to Chris Muir for the very cool mention in today's Day By Day! (h/t: The Populist)

The live player will start automatically if you click on the link to the extended entry. You can also listen from the player on the sidebar.

Continue reading "CQ Radio: Talk Radio Economics" »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/tabhair.cgi/10343

Comments (5)

Posted by Wolf Pangloss | June 25, 2007 1:33 PM

One thing that makes me wonder about that report (among many things) is the way that NPR is systematically left out of the leftist-talk-radio-station tally. It is clear to me that NPR has both morning and afternoon drive time leftist-news-talk-radio coverage that blankets every single part of the US, and it's paid for by the taxpayers. It has way better coverage than Rush Limbaugh. So what is the complaint again? That government needs to do something to restore some kind of balance to publicly funded radio in the US?

Let's look at balancing NPR first.

Posted by Wolf Pangloss | June 25, 2007 1:36 PM

One thing that makes me wonder about that report (among many things) is the way that NPR is systematically left out of the leftist-talk-radio-station tally. It is clear to me that NPR has both morning and afternoon drive time leftist-news-talk-radio coverage that blankets every single part of the US, and it's paid for by the taxpayers. It has way better coverage than Rush Limbaugh. So what is the complaint again? That government needs to do something to restore some kind of balance to publicly funded radio in the US?

Let's look at balancing NPR first.

Posted by Wolf Pangloss | June 25, 2007 1:39 PM

One thing that makes me wonder about that report (among many things) is the way that NPR is systematically left out of the leftist-talk-radio-station tally. It is clear to me that NPR has both morning and afternoon drive time leftist-news-talk-radio coverage that blankets every single part of the US, and it's paid for by the taxpayers. It has way better coverage than Rush Limbaugh. So what is the complaint again? That government needs to do something to restore some kind of balance to publicly funded radio in the US?

Let's look at balancing NPR first.

Posted by Wolf Pangloss | June 25, 2007 1:44 PM

One thing that makes me wonder about that report (among many things) is the way that NPR is systematically left out of the leftist-talk-radio-station tally. It is clear to me that NPR has both morning and afternoon drive time leftist-news-talk-radio coverage that blankets every single part of the US, and it's paid for by the taxpayers. It has way better coverage than Rush Limbaugh. So what is the complaint again? That government needs to do something to restore some kind of balance to publicly funded radio in the US?

Let's look at balancing NPR first.

Posted by Wolf Pangloss | June 25, 2007 1:44 PM

One thing that makes me wonder about that report (among many things) is the way that NPR is systematically left out of the leftist-talk-radio-station tally. It is clear to me that NPR has both morning and afternoon drive time leftist-news-talk-radio coverage that blankets every single part of the US, and it's paid for by the taxpayers. It has way better coverage than Rush Limbaugh. So what is the complaint again? That government needs to do something to restore some kind of balance to publicly funded radio in the US?

Let's look at balancing NPR first.