About
Captain Ed is a father and grandfather living in the Twin Cities area of Minnesota, a native Californian who moved to the North Star State because of the weather. He lives with his wife Marcia, also known as the First Mate, their two dogs, and frequently watch their granddaughter Kayla, whom Captain Ed calls The Little Admiral.
Read More
The Crows Nest
Would Early Primaries Allow More Donations?
Jim Geraghty at The Campaign Spot believes that candidates will benefit if primaries and caucuses get pushed into 2007. A loophole in campaign finance regulation appears to allow an extra $2,300 per donor for candidates if those elections are held this year. Be sure to check out Jim's analysis, and the surprising candidate that may benefit the most.
When Tom Met Jeralyn
One of the interesting aspects of politics is finding out that opponents are people, too. Jeralyn Merritt of TalkLeft met Rep. Tom Tancredo backstage at NBC's studios, and found him more likable than she had anticipated. Perhaps it was their mutual interest in Dog, The Bounty Hunter ...
Joe Lieberman A Right-Wing Nut?
That's what CAIR says, according to Joe Kaufman. He has a link to a CAIR official's blog post that calls Lieberman, along with John Bolton, former CIA director James Woolsey, and the Heritage Foundation's Peter Brookes as "extremists". Affad Shaikh also calls Dick Cheney a "fat bastard of a liar," apparently not meant as a pop-culture reference to the Austin Powers movies. (via Let Freedom Ring)
Broadband Homelessness
The Japanese have made homelessness more efficient, and more Net-friendly, too. Their Internet cafés have become homeless shelters for the struggling manual-labor sector. The problem has grown into such a problem that government intervention will shortly become a political priority.
Found My Law Firm
Power Line links twice to this story regarding an attorney at Faegre & Benson who refused to become a victim and helped capture a very dangerous man. Keith Radtke is a partner in the firm as is Power Line's John Hinderaker. Radtke is listed in satisfactory condition after getting shot in the back, but that didn't keep him from locking up his attacker in a wrestling grip until police could arrive. I don't know about you, but that's the kind of man I'd want as my counsel ....
Don't Click That YouTube E-mail
The latest in spam seems to be redirections from YouTube links in e-mail to IP addresses without domain names. They attempt to entice people by making it seem that they have been inadvertently YouTubed. I'm sure most people can see through this scam, but just in case, you've been warned ....
Rick Moran Escapes The Floods
Rick Moran has kept us up to date on his travails along the Algonquin River. Yesterday, the police showed up to get him evacuated before the river flooded his home -- but today, Rick finds that a minor miracle has taken place, and that his house survives ... at least for now. Keep Rick in your prayers, and keep checking in at Right Wing Nut House for updates.
Rule 1: Drag The Corpse On Over First
If I've learned anything in four years of blogging, don't try to be out in front of the death rumors, especially with the villains of the world. Saddam died a hundred deaths before we caught him alive in his spider hole, and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi almost as many before his demise last year. Osama may or may not be alive, but everyone's avoided speculating on his fate for a while now. Maybe Val at Babalu Blog will get luckier with his "Castro Is Dead" story. We all hope so. I'll wait for the announcement ....
Hobbs Choice
Volunteer Voters is holding its annual "Best of Nashville" on-line polls, and one of the categories is for the best political writer. Our friend Bill Hobbs, now posting at Newsbusters, and he'd like his on-line fans to cast their votes. Drop by and put one in for Bill if you get a chance!
Murtha Getting Backlogged On Apologies
Gary Gross of Let Freedom Ring sees another case collapsing on the Haditha charges. He's called for Murtha to apologize earlier, and adds another reason to the tally.
No Such Thing As 'Moderate' Islam?
Turkish PM Tayyip Erdogan told a television interviewer that he finds the label "moderate Islam" offensive. Shrink Wrapped has a lot more on this, but at least in the same interview Erdogan acknowledged that "radical Islam" exists, and that it's been a catastrophe. Be sure to read the whole post.
MS-NBC Gets Punk'd
Power Line has a great post on a lack of journalistic effort on the part of MS-NBC. In covering the Michael Vick story, they reported on what they thought was Al Sharpton's website proclaiming Vick's innocence. I guess Alex Johnson and two other MS-NBC reporters couldn't bother to read the title bar of the site, which proudly proclaims it as a "parody site".
New Instapundit Podcast On Pharmaceuticals
I just caught this e-mail from Glenn Reynolds about his new podcast with Richard Epstein, the author of Overdose: How Excessive Government Regulation Stifles Pharmaceutical Innovation. Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but the topic is important enough to make sure I carve out time for it tomorrow. Get their first and tell me what I'm missing ....
Fed Trying A 'Stealth Easing'?
The Federal Reserve seems to have conducted a quiet campaign to steady markets that started spinning out of control, according to King Banaian at SCSU Scholars. He thinks that the Fed has conducted a "stealth easing". Be sure to read his explanation and follow his lnks.
A Shameless Bit Of Sel-Promotion
Gateway Pundit and Val at Babalu Blog note a crass PR move by Hugo Chavez. Venezuela has responded to Peru's eathquake disaster with food shipments -- and with Hugo's smiling picture on the cans. He also uses the tuna-can label to undermine President Garcia of Peru, who narrowly defeated Chavez' pal Ollanto Humalla, whom the labels extol for his "solidarity" with Chavez.
Tacky beyond belief.
Comments (22)
Posted by RBMN | July 30, 2007 5:47 PM
I think OJ Simpson has volunteered to help Michael Vick find the real dog killers. So, maybe the NAACP can help fund the search....
Posted by kingronjo | July 30, 2007 5:57 PM
This is not a fight the NAACP should be involved in, unless they think that the dogs were violating Mr Vick's civil rights.
Posted by wolfwalker | July 30, 2007 6:08 PM
Are they now endorsing dogfighting and opposing the prosecution of those who allegedly stage these events and slaughter dogs who don't perform?
I really doubt it. There is in fact a legal tactic known as "piling on," in which prosecutors generate a very long list of charges against a defendant, with the goal of setting up a plea bargain on reduced charges. The NAACP may be trying to argue that the indictment against Vick includes some piling-on, and that the prosecutors wouldn't be doing that if Vick was white.
Posted by HumboldtBlue | July 30, 2007 6:19 PM
Hmm, maybe Dr. White could contact his NAACP peers in North Carolina. They certainly know just what piling on means outside of a court room, it means labeling three demonstrably innocent men guilty of a crime that never occurred.
Then again, that would require intellectual honesty.
Vick isn't under fire from every corner because he's black, no, he's under fire and will never play another down in the NFL because his name was listed 50 times in an indictment detailing depravity, cruelty and barbarity.
One pundit was getting hammered over the weekend because he made bumbling attempts to compare the Vick case with Kobe Bryant's alleged sexual assault.
But look at it honestly, if Vick had been accused of rape he'd be getting the benefit of the doubt because of the he-said she-said nature of the charge. Instead, he's accused of treating animals viciously, animals that have no voice of their own.
Posted by negentropy | July 30, 2007 6:46 PM
The NAACP should know something about piling on - after all, they piled it high and deep in North Carolina.
Posted by Rhymes With Right | July 30, 2007 7:13 PM
Isn't this the same NAACP that adopted the stance that the Duke lacrosse players needed to be punished before there were even charges against them, much less a trial?
Could it be that the life and reputation of a black man matters more than those of white men? And the word of a stripper is worth more than documentary and video evidence?
Are they once again proving that the NAACP is nothing more than the "Klan with a tan"?
Posted by Philip | July 30, 2007 7:20 PM
It racism. Racism pure and simple. Racism from the NAACP.
Posted by Pierre | July 30, 2007 8:17 PM
Captain why haven't you commented on the case of Stanislav Shmulevich who is being prosecuted for putting a koran into the toilet?
Posted by Mark1971 | July 30, 2007 8:18 PM
National Association for the Advancement of Canine Pugilism
Posted by LuckyBogey | July 30, 2007 8:31 PM
I saw on the Atlanta news where protesters had signs that read "Black Atlanta For Vick". Vick also gave an interview on the radio today and has now found God and really misses his teammates. I can picture Vick driving a White Pickup truck down Peachtree before he becomes the starting Quarterback on the prison football team!
The judge in Richmond will not allow this to turn into another OJ. I'm sure the Judge will provide a Bible to read in his jail cell. Moral of this story: Black or White, Don't kill dogs in the Bulldog Nation's backyard.
Posted by James I. Hymas | July 30, 2007 8:47 PM
Main Stream Media
No discernable relationship to " endorsing dogfighting and opposing the prosecution of those who allegedly stage these events and slaughter dogs who don't perform".
Completely irrelevant to "Filing charges in court when grand juries hand down indictments".
Posted by Dusty | July 30, 2007 9:19 PM
I'm blowing the whistle and calling a penalty for unsportsman-like conduct on the sidelines by the waterboys.
Posted by Bennett | July 30, 2007 9:23 PM
While it is true that Michael Vick is wealthy and capable of providing an effective defense for himself (attorney wise I mean), his money is really nothing compared to the resources available to the state. I don't take this as the NAACP speaking out in favor of dog-fighting, I take it as a concern that the defendant be afforded every right he is entitled to have, just as we all would want for ourselves, whether the charges be dog fighting or shoplifting. This is especially true when the charges are heinous as it is so easy to inflame public opinion before a single witness has been sworn. The gov't. can obtain all the indictments it wants, it still has to prove its case and convince a jury to convict. Until that happens, Michael Vick is innocent and he should be treated as such. Otherwise, we're no better than some third world dictatorship putting on show trials.
Posted by stackja1945 | July 30, 2007 9:28 PM
Black or White. Dr White seems all white about black. Black letter law?
wikipedia - Black letter law
Justice should be color-blind. If not. Why not?
Posted by John Adams | July 30, 2007 9:44 PM
The so-called “piling on” is blatantly obvious. Since when is the FBI free to divert scarce federal resources into activities under the jurisdiction of sheriff Billy Bob (who could have resolved the matter in a few weeks without making a federal case out of it)? Are the FBI now clearly stating that they suddenly have sufficient resources to investigate the alarming reports from responsible citizens regarding wild eyed foreign Arabs taking very suspicious “flight training”. Or are we simply back to pre-9/11, the FBI as usual, leaving an undefended America to face who knows what while they investigate dog fighting to get their name in the paper and collect awards from the SPCA? And what is a federal prosecutor doing in the middle of this? Are we back to the state lines nonsense? Even fifty years ago, with that horse’s behind Hoover still around, making a federal case out of dog fighting would have gotten nothing but a good laugh. Gee, I guess we better re-think taking the cat on vacation to Florida again this winter.
Posted by unclesmrgol | July 30, 2007 10:23 PM
What you have to realize is that this isn't the NAACP national organization speaking here -- its the President of the Atlanta chapter (who may or may not speak for the chapter itself, and may nor may not speak for the national organization).
If he isn't really speaking for the NAACP itself, we'll soon know, won't we?
Posted by ck | July 30, 2007 11:49 PM
I hardly think Vick needs help - I wish the NAACP would jump on some relevant cases or cases in which people actually need help because they can't defend themselves.
Posted by Tony | July 31, 2007 2:55 AM
Like the NAACP is worth listening to in the first place.
Glad to see the comparisons to the Duke case. I wonder if Jesse J. will give Vick another scholarship.
Posted by Jim | July 31, 2007 9:21 AM
Google NAACP and Duke...
Posted by truthogre | July 31, 2007 9:46 AM
It is not a question of whether or not the NAACP endorses dog fighting. The simple truth is that the NAACP will jump into a fray purposely ignorant of any facts just to play the race card and pump up the PC cancer that has been festering for decades. They have no need for the truth, they have no need for facts, all they need do is play on the liberal Political Correctness that infests this country and they will be not only heard but also given merit. It is comical how simple the people are that listen, believe and follow PC propaganda regardless of the facts. It also amazes me how quickly someone with facts, with truth is crucified under the PC banner if they speak out against a so-called minority. Isn't it clear enough to mainstream America what is happening? Is it not bad enough that our judicial system has flipped from one for victim’s rights to one for the rights of the offender? Do we now wish to continue down this road that the few have so much power over the many under a PC doctrine? WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
Posted by Monkei | July 31, 2007 10:16 AM
Lets see ... Black's support Vick just because he is black? Wingnuts support Bush just because he is GOP? Neither deserve the support yet they both get it.
Same old song.
Posted by docjim505 | July 31, 2007 10:24 AM
There is merit in both sides of the argument.
1. The NAACP certainly isn't making itself look good by playing the race card in favor of a man against whom there is credible evidence of dogfighting and other barbaric cruelty to animals, BUT...
2. He hasn't been found guilty of anything.
Not so long ago, many of us rightfully decried Duke University for punishing the lacrosse players before it was ever shown that they were guilty. Shouldn't we reserve judgement of Vick unless and until it can be clearly demonstrated that he is the loathesome and cruel monster that he appears to be?
And as for the argument made by John Adams about the FBI... Yeah, I do sort of wonder if the feds don't have anything better to do with their time.