September 27, 2007

Kerrey No Hsu-In

The Norman Hsu scandal has affected more than just the Democratic presidential primaries. The Politico reports that Nebraska Republicans have already started talking about Bob Kerrey's connections to the con man turned Democratic fundraiser, just in case Kerrey decides to run for Chuck Hagel's open seat in 2008:

If former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey decides to run for the Senate, it’s clear that he will have to address his connections with Hsu, whom he recruited to serve on the board of the New School under his presidency.

The Hsu affair already is being used by Republicans as leverage to try to ward off a run by Kerrey, the Democrats’ favored candidate to compete for the seat of retiring Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel.

Republicans privately acknowledge that Kerrey is a first-tier candidate and hope their attacks dissuade him from jumping in. They would have an easier time retaining the seat if Kerrey didn’t run.

“Bob Kerrey was not only a receiver of contributions [to the New School], he actively recruited [Hsu] to the New School,” said National Republican Senatorial Committee spokeswoman Rebecca Fisher. “Nebraskans need to be aware of that.”

Kerrey arguably had more responsibility to vet Hsu than any of the Democratic politicians that took his contributions. Kerrey essentially hired him to oversee the New School as a member of the Board of Trustees. The fact that Kerrey never even bothered to have a competent background check done on a man connected to a school calls his judgment into question. What if Hsu had other, more sinister convictions on his record?

Nebraska would present a tough challenge for Kerrey in any case. He hasn't lived there for a while, spending his time in New York in his role as head of the famously liberal New School. His entire family lives there with him, which doesn't exactly build a case for the more conservative Nebraskans to send him back as their representative. The Hsu case emphasizes Kerrey's ties to East Coast liberalism as well as the corruption in this cycle's presidential campaign.

Kerrey and the Democrats will no doubt object to the Republican attacks. However, the echoes of their Jack Abramoff accusations in the 2006 cycle have not yet disappeared, and Abramoff had plenty of ties to Democrats, including Harry Reid. Norman Hsu will be this cycle's Jack Abramoff, and so far, no Hsu money seems to have graced Republican coffers. Hsu will be sauce for the gander in this season.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/tabhacht.cgi/13843

Comments (22)

Posted by Teresa | September 27, 2007 9:57 AM

Well one difference between Abramoff and Hsu is that several Republicans have gone to jail for their dealings with Abramoff and so far no one has for Hsu.

Posted by Kevin | September 27, 2007 10:05 AM

Teresa says:

"Well one difference between Abramoff and Hsu is that several Republicans have gone to jail for their dealings with Abramoff and so far no one has for Hsu."

I'd counter with "give it time, but given that William Jefferson (D-LA) is still a free man, I fear no Democrat will ever be held accountable for their part in any corruption scandal, let alone in the Hsu fiasco.

Posted by rbj | September 27, 2007 10:12 AM

the New School is not merely liberal, it is socialist.

Posted by Teresa | September 27, 2007 10:31 AM

Umm... Kevin, last time I looked the Republicans were in control of the Department of Justice so whose fault is it that William Jefferson hasn't been charged or prosecuted?

Posted by LuckyBogey | September 27, 2007 10:40 AM

Don't forget that Bernie Schwartz also serves as Vice Chairman of the board of trustees of New School University and was the one who vouched for Norman.

As soon as the 260 names are public from the FEC reporting requirements at the end of the Qtr, we will be able to link the other associated contributors to the Democrat party and Mr. Hsu.

The trolls should be alone any minute now telling us to "move along, nothing here"! Sorry, this will not go away!

Posted by RD | September 27, 2007 10:51 AM

Moo Hsu gander? Yesterdays WAPo had an interesting story on this Hill/Billy Hsu shine buoy.. Seems that the $6mil that showed in his bank account is no longer to be found. Lots of people after what little money they can find including the $2mil supposedly forfeited but now restored because he was restored a la the failed flight. Seems that some want even the large retainer he has paid his lawyer refunded. Didn't I tell you the lawyers would get it all? (couldn't resist that cackle). No, I think Kerrey has taken a well placed Hsu to his posterior and his ambitions.

Posted by Carol Herman | September 27, 2007 10:53 AM

Kerry IS the real competition to Algore!

The other idiots, can debate all they like; they don't pass muster. The product doesn't "fly off the shelves."

And, it's only a question on how the "bowling pins" will fall.

Meanwhile, Obama's wife gets her own headline this morning, at DRUDGE: "IOWA OR BUST."

In other words, the wife spelled out what happens if Obama doesn't take Iowa.

Smart move. (She must be tired as all get out, and her husband's "run" for office.)

She's one of the few voices, as DRUDGE pointed out, who comes across as sincere.

Posted by The Mechanical Eye | September 27, 2007 11:11 AM

Slight point, but on-topic:

Morrissey and Reynolds need to stop the Hsu-puns. If you believe this is deeply-serious affair involving the possible corruption of a likely President of the United States, and that it cuts into the very fabric of the Republic, you need to stop using awful jokes to get people interested in it.

Because the puns re-enforce my first gut reaction to this entire saga: an overblown "scandal" of the type that make Bill Clinton's opponents look petty, desperate, and feeble in the 1990s.

DU

Posted by rbj | September 27, 2007 11:23 AM

Teresa, you do realize it takes time to investigate crimes, and complicated financial ones even more time.

And if the Republicans are so evil & in charge of the DoJ, why haven't they just rounded up all the Democrats who took Hsu money?

Posted by richard mcenroe | September 27, 2007 12:01 PM

Hsu's your daddy, ME?

Posted by Teresa | September 27, 2007 12:07 PM

Rbj -- And if the Republicans are so evil & in charge of the DoJ, why haven't they just rounded up all the Democrats who took Hsu money?

-------------------

Ummm, because it wasn't a crime? It just looks really bad.

Kevin was alleging that Jefferson has "gotten away" with his crimes because he is a Democrat. I was pointing out that the people in charge of not letting him get away with it are the Republican DOJ. (Although at this point, I'll bet they are waiting to indict a little closer to election day.)

Posted by Kevin | September 27, 2007 12:37 PM

Teresa says:

"Ummm, because it wasn't a crime? It just looks really bad.

Kevin was alleging that Jefferson has "gotten away" with his crimes because he is a Democrat. I was pointing out that the people in charge of not letting him get away with it are the Republican DOJ. (Although at this point, I'll bet they are waiting to indict a little closer to election day.)"

Uh, Theresa, we don't know that crimes weren't committed by the Democrats in question. That's why a full investigation is needed.

I did not mean to convey that Jefferson "got away" with his crimes, though - re-reading my earlier post - I can see that my words probably gave that impression. What I meant to say is that Jefferson is still a free man, even though he has been indicted. Whether or not he is jailed, and the amount of bond - if any - is not determined by the DoJ. It is determined by the presiding judge.

Posted by RD | September 27, 2007 12:58 PM

DU's advice will be taken by me,also and I will treat this more seriously because I do believe it is a serious matter. Also, I should probably use the words "allegedly" paid his lawyer and perhaps acknowledge that the lawyers might not get all of his money-they might have to get in line with the rest of the screwed. Gotta be careful what you say and how you say it nowadays, especially where lawyers are concerned.

Posted by Micah | September 27, 2007 4:19 PM

Yeah, DU, selling weapons intelligence to the ChiComms for campaign cash is SO overblown... all the REAL traitors want victory in Iraq, closed borders, accountability in government.
When you go by "The Mechanical Eye", I can't help but think of Sauron in LOTR. (which is evil, btw)

Posted by patrick neid | September 27, 2007 5:03 PM

The major reason the Hsu story will probably lead nowhere vs the Abramoff story (he gave 1/3 to dems) are the editorial pages of of most of our newspapers.
Unless the public is bombarded with facts and falsehoods for weeks on end all stories die.
While it is true that bloggers can initiate and drive stories if the MSM refuses to chirp in the stories mostly die.

What bloggers can do, and do very well, is unmask the phony stories the Rather's of the world are so famous for.

Now I admit pictures of Hsu and Hillary naked in bed might get some traction especially if Bill is taking the photos!

Posted by Angus | September 27, 2007 6:14 PM

The Abramoff story mattered to very few outside the blogosphere. It was good for a few days of news stories, and a number of later "guilt by association" comments. Ask the average voter about Jack Abramoff and I'll bet that 90% or more will respond with: "Who?"

For similar reasons, the Hsu story will matter just as little.

Posted by Del Dolemonte | September 27, 2007 8:08 PM

Teresa: if you actually did some research before shooting your mouth off, you would know that the "Bush" Justice Department is infested with Clinton holdovers. If in fact it WAS Bush's Justice Department, such people as Sandy Berger would have the book thrown at them. But instead...

When one examines those who have piloted the USJD investigations and prosecutions of political malfeasance one thing is abundantly clear. In each instance the person charged with the investigation or prosecution was a Clinton holdover or a Clinton appointee. Here are a few examples, courtesy of the New Media Journal:

In the case of The Barrett Report and the investigation and prosecution of Henry Cisneros, Lee Radek was intimately affiliated with not only the DNC and Democrat rainmakers, but with the Clinton-Gore White House. Jo Ann Harris who appointed Radek, was appointed by President Clinton.

In the case of Hillary Clinton’s campaign finance fraud, we again see Lee Radek running interference against any credible investigation and prosecution.

And where Sandy Berger’s travesty of justice is concerned:

▪ Glenn Fine, the Inspector General for the USJD, was appointed by Bill Clinton, continued serving as a holdover from the Clinton Administration into the Bush Administration and is on record as being a donor to the DNC and/or Democrat candidate(s).

▪ Bruce Swartz, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the USJD Criminal Division, was appointed by Bill Clinton, continued serving as a holdover from the Clinton Administration into the Bush Administration and is on record as being a donor to the DNC and/or Democrat candidate(s).

▪ John Dion, Chief of the USJD Counterespionage Section at the USJD, was a holdover from the Clinton Administration into the Bush Administration.

▪ Howard Sklamberg, USJD trial attorney from the public integrity unit, was a holdover from the Clinton Administration into the Bush Administration and is on record as being a donor to the DNC and/or Democrat candidate(s).

It is apparent to anyone taking an honest look at the current situation of the USJD that during the eight years of the Clinton Administration, the Clinton White House loaded the United States Justice Department with enough upper and mid-level political appointments and promotions to circumvent any investigation and/or prosecution of crimes originating and perpetrated at the hands of those on their “team.”

It is equally apparent that the Clinton White House intentionally placed these people in positions where they could inflict the most political damage on the opposition party by simply investigating until either a crime was discovered or created, or there was enough dirt run through the Clinton-friendly mainstream media to destroy the subject’s credibility and ability to be effective.

The implications of a political and partisan United States Justice Department are disturbing and lay the groundwork for the demise of our Constitutional government, a government of laws such as it is. That American justice would be administered politically on such a transparently partisan scale lends itself to an image of a nation where political corruption is accepted and political persecution is tolerated, which side benefiting from both being decided by the spoils of a successful political campaign and the patronage that includes.

Remember, Bill Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys when he came into office. Perhaps now we can all understand why the Democrats are so up in arms over President Bush firing eight.

Posted by daytrader | September 28, 2007 5:08 AM

Well according to Flips work, only two associated donors gave 1000 total to Tom Gallagher for his failed run for Governor of Fla. That is the only identified Republican money in the pot so far.

Bob Novak say Bob Kerrey will run, but some local papers are commenting that he doesn't want to leave New York because of family reasons.

Also there is a lot of local speculation that he may run for Mayor of NYC.

Posted by daytrader | September 28, 2007 5:29 AM

RD

I believe the story said that the BOA account only had about 83k in it, but there was another bank they still had not looked at yet.

If you have another story I missed, please post the link.

Posted by RD | September 28, 2007 11:14 AM

daytrader-no, you're right I was reading too much into the story. I thought since the former stories said that his checkbook showed he had $2mil and this story said nothing about it that it had disappeared but you are right-there is no link to back up that assumption. Sorry. That is why I enjoy this site-there is always someone checking for facts and trying to keep us honest and accurate and on our toes and maybe why I should leave the posting to those who want "only the facts, ma'am."

Posted by RD | September 28, 2007 12:11 PM

correction to above post--I should have said $6mil.

Posted by daytrader | September 28, 2007 3:16 PM

Minkoff said the Bank of America account contains about $83,000, and he didn't know how much was in the Philippines-based Metrobank New York account.

http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200709261424DOWJONESDJONLINE000657_FORTUNE5.htm

Post a comment