October 17, 2007

Harkin's Earmark For La Raza

Senator Tom Harkin must believe that Iowans have a vested interest in the agenda of the National Council of La Raza. The group, which has positioned itself on the forefront of the blanket amnesty approach to immigration and opposed to efforts to enforce the border, will get a nice $500,000 grant from Harkin, a part of the 2008 HHS appropriations bill that still hasn't found its way to the floor of the Democratic-controlled Senate. The grant funds "technical assistance on Hispanic workforce issues including capacity building. Language barriers, and health care job training”, a generic description that means anything La Raza wants it to mean.

This looks like a bargain for La Raza. Its officers only contributed $1500 to Harkin's last campaign, and they got a half-million dollar grant in return. That's a 30-fold return on investment, an excellent choice of politicians in the free market of earmarking and backscratching. Harkin doesn't bother to mention his largesse to La Raza on his official Senate website, even though it's chock-full of other announcements of his benificence (with our tax dollars) towards Iowa and America.

La Raza specifically disavows the reconquista and Aztlan manifestos on its website. I'm sure they do valuable work in many areas. I see no reason why the US government has to fund those activities, especially through a process that has no oversight and no accountability for either Harkin or NCLR in how those monies get spent. Perhaps Harkin might want to add an explanation for federal funding of NCLR's operations.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/tabhair.cgi/14965

Comments (13)

Posted by len | October 17, 2007 10:01 AM

perhaps a 300-fold return on investment...?

Posted by Kevin | October 17, 2007 10:11 AM

In the spirit of the reconquista, maybe the earmark should be paid out as 500,000 Pesos.

Posted by mike | October 17, 2007 10:39 AM

I have mixed feelings about the values and wisdom of anything that supports any organization that promotes the interests of people based on race, ethnicity, religion etc. But that aside, I think it is entirely appropriate for people who do want to support such groups to be able to do so. I also think it would be appropriate for our government to help facilitate personal donations to such causes, for people who wish to contribute. That could be done by making donations tax deductible, or even by placing one of those check boxes on the 10-40 from where you agree to have X% of any refund donated to a charitable cause of your choice; like the one about presidential campaign funds.

But the real point behind all this is that groups like La Raza know they are not attractive enough to a sufficient number of people with money to donate for them to be able to rely on free will donations or contributions. So, by lobbying to get an earmark grant, they are asking for something other than free will donations and contributions, which is contributions under the force of the federal government, to be enforced by people with guns in the form of our own IRS.

The real questions is why do we sheeple continue to tolerate this from of oppression for us and our children?

Posted by D Kosloff | October 17, 2007 11:04 AM

Perhaps Harkin traded earmarks with somebody who would have taken more heat for the crime. Sort of like that movie (and its remake) about the guys on the train who each wanted to kill somebody else on the train. They traded victims so that each would be killing somebody who would not be connected to them. Cris Cross?

Posted by Laura | October 17, 2007 11:10 AM

In Kansas City, La Raza is currently pulling an "extortion" stunt against the new mayor and the city itself. The new mayor appointed a women to the parks board (yeah, that all powerful parks board)by the name of Frances Semler. The head of the parks board belongs to a group called The Coalition of Hispanic Organizations (COHO). After the appointment, it came out that Semler is a member of the Minutemen. Now La Raza and (somehow the NAACP) are threatening to pull their future planned national conventions from the city if the mayor does not remove Semler from the parks board. So far, the mayor has refused to do so but the pressure is building and The Kansas City Star has been four square behind the La Raza/NAACP cause with editorials and opinion pieces almost every day calling for Semler to resign.

Posted by Bombast | October 17, 2007 11:55 AM

Amazing how in their disavowal of "reconquista" they translate "La Raza" as "The Community."

Every Spanish dictionary I can find translates it as "The Race."

Posted by flenser | October 17, 2007 12:07 PM

La Raza is not exactly hard up for the money. They are bankrolled by large American corporations to the tune of about $20 million per year. WalMart is a generous donor for instance.

The hard left and American corporations may seem like strange bedfellows, but that does not stop them snuggling up to each other.

Posted by Jay | October 17, 2007 12:12 PM

Harkin or Bush or Kennedy or McCain or Clinton or Rudy...what's the difference? La Raza has them all in their backpocket.

Mexico IS invading our country and our political leaders are helping to finance it and not objecting to it in any way.

Learn Spanish (and get a muslim prayer rug) cuz both Latinos and Muslims are flooding into this country and bringing their cultures with them.

Posted by Patrick | October 17, 2007 12:16 PM

And by paying protection money WalMart avoids any unwelcome demonstrations or boycotts. La Raza is merely picking up on a technique perfected by race hustlers/shakedown artists like the "Rev." Jesse Jackson and the "Rev." Al Sharpton.

Posted by eaglewings | October 17, 2007 1:08 PM

Sorry but la communidad is 'the community' even in Mexico. La Raza means the RACE. And La Raza's alleged 'disavowals' of reconquista promotions on its websites is about as sincere as CAIR's disavowels of Hamas funding and/or Arafat's diavowals of each terrorist episode inside Israel.
One need only remember last year's 'immigration' protests, and the La Raza Banners with reconquista sloganeering to know how disingenuous this militant racist organization is.

Posted by flenser | October 17, 2007 1:19 PM

And by paying protection money WalMart avoids any unwelcome demonstrations or boycotts.

You give them too much credit. American corporation are in favor of the third world invasion. One, it gives them lower priced labor, and two, it gives them more customers to buy whatever they sell. It's no coincedence that the Chamber of Commerece files lawsuits to block any sort of genuine immigration reform.

It's not protection money. To a large extent, La Raza is a front for American business interests. Why do you think so many allegedly conservative Republicans are lining up with them?

The McCain/Bush/Graham/Kyl immigration bill, defeated a few months ago, included a provision to give bushels of money to La Raza.

Posted by syn | October 17, 2007 3:07 PM

Well now, let's see who was it screaming racist, bigoted nativists at those who were against Illegal Immigration?


Flenser

You speak as if Mexican corporations and the Mexican government have nothing to do with La Raza and are somehow not in favor of a third world invasion.

THe actions of the the open borders crowd marching on behalf of international corporatists speaks for itself.

Posted by flenser | October 17, 2007 3:29 PM

Well now, let's see who was it screaming racist, bigoted nativists at those who were against Illegal Immigration?

Many prominent Republicans were among them. For instance, Graham, Chao and Chavez. And don't forget Huckabee.

You speak as if Mexican corporations and the Mexican government have nothing to do with La Raza and are somehow not in favor of a third world invasion.

I do? I'm just pointing out who funds them. Reality is what it is.

I don't expect Mexico and Mexicans to have the best interests of America at heart. I do expect that from Americans. But too many Republicans have joined the Democrats in becoming globalists who find the concept of "America" to be rather old-fashioned.


Post a comment