« The Second Half Of 9/11 | Main | Hate E-Mail Results In Termination »
As promised, the Washington Post has updated its story by Dan Balz published yesterday that claimed both CNN and Fox had sold national advertising to NARAL for its fraudulent commercial insinuating that Supreme Court nominee John Roberts supported violence against women. It ran the correction at the top of the original story on its website:
Correction to This Article
Because of incorrect information from NARAL Pro-Choice America, an Aug. 9 article incorrectly said that a new television ad attacking Judge John G. Roberts Jr. would air on the Fox News Channel.
The Post acknowledges that NARAL lied about its ad placement, and one can see the transparent motivation behind the fib. They wanted to show that their ad passed muster across the political spectrum by saying that FNC had also approved the ad for airtime. Their willingness to use lies to combat the Roberts nomination should prove instructive for not just reporters who rely on their information, but for those who need to measure NARAL's credibility while pondering NARAL's arguments.
Some criticize Dan Balz for not confirming the ad buy with Fox (and CNN) independent of NARAL's assertions. However, that may be just a bit harsh. Their claims of ad buys doesn't strike me as something that would cause immediate skepticism; the ad itself drew so much of it that the details of the purchases probably seemed secondary. Balz did the right thing in the end. He burned the source that lied to him and corrected the record for all to see.Sphere It View blog reactions
TrackBack URL for this entry is
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WaPo Correction Names NARAL For False Info On Fox:
» Follow up on NARAL ad airing from Sister Toldjah
So not only did NARAL lie in the ad about Roberts’ "supporting abortion clinic bombers" they also lied about the ad appearing on Fox News. [Read More]
Tracked on August 11, 2005 10:36 AM
» The Roberts Confirmation Battle from bRight & Early
While the confirmation hearings for John Roberts to replace Sandra Day O'Conner on the Supreme Court are less than a month from their start, the efforts to discredit him have begun. (Some say even before he was named). Confirm Them examines the first... [Read More]
Tracked on August 11, 2005 10:38 AM
Tracked on August 11, 2005 12:38 PM
» http://www.righttrack.us/?p=27 from The Right Track
A lot has been said about the John Roberts/NARAL ad in the blogosphere. Among them are: Michelle Malkin here and here Captain Ed at the Captain’s Quarters here, here, here, here, here, and here Daily Kos weighs in with views from the left h... [Read More]
Tracked on August 13, 2005 11:38 PM
My Other Blog!
Comment Moderation Policy - Please Read!
Skin The Site
Des Moines Register
International Herald Tribune
The Weekly Standard
The New Republic
AP News (Yahoo! Headlines)
Guardian Unlimited (UK)
New York Times
Los Angeles Times
- dave on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- brooklyn on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- rbj on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- Ken on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- Robin S. on Requiem For A Betrayed Hero
- RBMN on Hillary Not Hsu Happy
- NoDonkey on Another National Health Care System Horror Story
- Robin Munn on Fred Thompson Interview Transcript
- filistro on When Exactly Did Art Die?
Proud Ex-Pat Member of the Bear Flag League!