April 7, 2007

Indonesia On The Brink?

Der Spiegel reports that Indonesia's ostensibly secular government faces increasing pressure from the Islamists in their midst. The Muslim nation may start down the road towards a Taliban-Lite government as radical Islamists gain more seats in their assembly and demand a greater imposition of shari'a law:

With 221 million inhabitants, of which 194 million are Muslims, the island nation is not only Southeast Asia's most populous country, but is also home to the world's largest Muslim population. And that population looks to be growing increasingly devout. Significantly more women wear the headscarf today than a decade ago, and the number of Indonesians making the pilgrimage to Mecca grows year after year. Alcoholic beverages are disappearing from the shelves of supermarkets, and in some places those who violate the Islamic ban on alcohol already face public whipping -- a brutal spectacle that is even broadcast on local television stations.

Since two bombs killed 202 people, most of them Western tourists, at the Kuta beach resort on the island of Bali in the fall of 2002, Islamist terrorists have repeatedly attacked Western targets at the same time of the year, prompting Indonesians to refer to autumn as "bomb season." Al-Qaida, which is clearly allied with local extremists, has identified the country as a battlefield of the future.

While the country's secular president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, may be tough on terrorists, there is little he can do to stop the Islamists from gaining political ground. The winner of the struggle between proponents of a secular state and radical imams calling for a theocracy stands to capture a valuable prize -- one of the world's most strategically important countries. All major shipping routes connecting Europe and East Asia pass through the waters off this island nation. It is precisely here, in this archipelago between the Straits of Malacca and the Celebes Sea, that a new front in the battle of cultures is emerging.

The reference to shipping lanes seems rather significant. Not long ago, the History Channel produced a show on modern pirates -- men who do a lot more than just shout "Aaaargh!" The new pirates have attacked shipping all over the world, but have especially concentrated their efforts in the waters of Indonesia. They have even, at least once, hijacked a ship just to learn its operation, maneuver it for a while, and then escape from it without docking it. On that occasion, they also stole all of the technical manuals but left the cargo with the terrorized crew, which survived the incident.

It looked like a dry run for an attack similar to 9/11, but using shipping rather than commercial airliners. With 95% of the world's oil transported by sea -- and even worse, a large percentage of its highly explosive liquid natural gas transported by tankers -- the shipping lanes of Indonesia seem very susceptible to that tactic by a group with al-Qaeda's organization.

That is one reason why the radicalization of Indonesia has such dire consequences for the entire world. If AQ and its religious allies can create a Taliban-like state there, the security implications could be catastrophic. Certainly, Australia would face the most direct threat, but with control of the shipping lanes falling into the hands of a terrorist-supporting government, that threat will go global in an instant. It would require a much larger naval presence by the Western powers in that region and probably some sort of convoy arrangement that doesn't exist at the moment for the marine trade.

The shipping trade might find other routes through the Indian Ocean and bypass Indonesia. If that were possible, it could reduce the threat -- but it will hasten the collapse of Indonesia. With the radical Islamists targeting Western assets every fall (referred to by the locals as "bomb season"), foreign investment has dropped by over a third last year alone. Instead, capital has shifted to Singapore, Malaysia, and Vietnam, causing a collapse of the Indonesian economy. The poor have been easy recruitment targets for the radicals, especially living on $2 per day, and a further shift of foreign investment will hasten that process.

The West will face a crisis soon in the world's largest Muslim nation. We had better pay attention to what happens in Indonesia, because al-Qaeda has already highlighted it as a future battleground for its war on the West. We cannot afford to let it slip away.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/cq082307.cgi/9614

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Indonesia On The Brink?:

» Security in Malacca Straits from Cranial Cavity
Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore are the littoral states bordering the Malacca Straits, the most important maritime link between East and West. Thru its 900km length pass over 50,000 commercial ships a year. About a third of the world’s trade... [Read More]

Comments (9)

Posted by patrick neid [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 8:49 AM

"The West will face a crisis soon in the world's largest Muslim nation. We had better pay attention to what happens in Indonesia, because al-Qaeda has already highlighted it as a future battleground for its war on the West. We cannot afford to let it slip away."

slip away? that boat left 10 years ago and there is absolutely nothing we can do about it except watch it sink somewhere off shore.
once radical islam gets a toe hold and rolls a few heads down the alley, people especially westerners flee.

the only folks that can rescue islam are muslims--no one else. we can fight wars when they encroach on us directly, physically or economically, but indonesia---not a chance.

the only place i watch with interest is europe. they are our canaries. how they go is probably how we go. judging from pelosi's dhimmitude it won't be pretty but it will be fast.

i still think the big money is in designer burkas!

Posted by zooks527 [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 9:20 AM

"With 95% of the world's oil transported by sea -- and even worse, a large percentage of its highly explosive liquid natural gas transported by tankers -- the shipping lanes of Indonesia seem very susceptible to that tactic by a group with al-Qaeda's organization"

While I agree with the sentiment, I have to take a bit of exception to the description of LNG as "highly explosive".

LNG by itself is quite stable. Once vaporized and mixed with an appropriate amount of air, it has both flammable and explosive characteristics. However, the doomsday scenarios of exploding LNG tankers (played endlessly here in Massachusetts by opponents of existing and proposed LNG terminals) are quite difficult to achieve.

If you could punch a hole in an LNG tanker (no small task) and light the resulting stream of LNG as it boiled to gas, you would have one hell of a fire. It is difficult to construct a scenario, however, where you could release the LNG, vaporize it, and mix it with enough air to detonate a large portion of the cargo at one time. Once a fire had been started, you would get a spreading flame front, but the chances of an explosion would drop markedly.

OTOH, you could do signficant damage if you controlled the ship, I would dread seeing what determined terrorists could do with it.

Posted by smagar [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 9:21 AM

We had better pay attention to what happens in Indonesia, because al-Qaeda has already highlighted it as a future battleground for its war on the West. We cannot afford to let it slip away.

OK...how do we keep Indonesia from slipping away? Captain, what should we do to prevent Indonesia from slipping into the grasp of Islamists?

Posted by RBMN [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 9:47 AM

One thing that radical Muslims know, and Americans seem to have forgotten, is that if radicals can get hold of the education system, they're 2/3 of the way there--to whatever long-term goal they have. As the Chinese proverb says, "Much easier to bend the young twig than bend the tree."

Posted by Bennett [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 9:59 AM

Interesting post but possibly we are going to have to concede some of these countries sooner or later or become a whole lot serious about all of this. We're already fighting (or assisting in some way) to keep Islamic terrorists from establishing a firm foothold in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, the Horn of Africa, the Phillipines ..the list goes on.

So far, the results are at best mixed. We have little support from other nations, the international and transnational organizations are useless or counter-productive and we aren't even of one mind about all this here in our own country (witness, for example, Pelosi's recent Mideast road trip). We have no clear strategy, no consensus on tactics and no coherent vision of our objective, other than to keep the nuts from blowing us up here on our own soil.

And on this happy note, I wish all a blessed Easter. He is Risen.

Posted by Mat [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 11:38 AM

Instead, capital has shifted to Singapore, Malaysia, and Vietnam, causing a collapse of the Indonesian economy.
The IMF predicts that GDP growth in Indonesia will come out as 5.2% for 2006 and 6.0% for 2007. The same figures for the USA are 3.4% and 2.9% respectively, where apparently "The economy continues its growth under the stewardship of the Bush administration." So how is Bush's stewardship of the economy so masterful if it barely manages to scrape half the growth of a "collapsing" economy?

No, don't tell me, it's all just statistical gobbledygook cooked up by the evil socialist European-led IMF to drag the USA down. Curse those Europeans! Will their propaganda war never cease?

Posted by Snippet [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 7, 2007 11:39 AM

Indonesia,

Don't let the door hitchya in the ass on your way out.

I think we have done all we can (maybe too much) to save "The Moslem World" from itself.

Yes, it' descent into NeoIslamotalitarianism will be catastrophic on many levels, but our efforts to prevent this catastrophe seem to just add fuel to the fire.

If this is what "they" want, then there is simply nothing we can do - without looking like raging hypocrites - to prevent them from giving themselves the experience that will teach them what no amount of eloquent and inspirational speeches about the nobility of democracy and reason seems able to.

Posted by burt [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 8, 2007 8:33 AM

LNG is dangerous because it is volatile and flammable with air. In an unconfined air environment, it is not a realistic explosive hazard at all. Unconfined gas explosions at atmospheric pressure don't produce significant wind or overpressure unless they proceed to detonation. To turn LNG into an explosive, it is necessary to vaporize and then mix it with air within fairly narrow explosive limits and then to properly initiate the mixture. Because LNG boils at low temperature, its vapor is denser that ambient air. Both the pure vapor and the mixture with air are dense and will spread close to the ground or sea. All this is easy; just spill it on the ground to allow the heat from the ground to cause boiling without allowing sparks or other fire initiators to start a fire. After waiting for these things to happen, it is necessary to detonate a significant sized high explosive detonator within a region within the explosive limits of the mixture. This could all be done, but it wouldn't occur by accident and it is not as easy to do or more dangerous than fire which could happen by accident.

Posted by Cybrludite [TypeKey Profile Page] | April 10, 2007 4:21 AM

No offense, Bennett, but at first I parsed that as "He is Riesen!", and started kicking myself for not thinking of it during the "Chocolate Jesus" incident ...